gareth wrote:

"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
...

You come a little late to this discussion. Perhaps you would like to
explain, on the basis of your theory that there are two kinds of
electromagnetic radiation based on the means of their generation,

I do not have such a theory.

Both are the same type whether generated continuously or photonically.

From which it folllows inevitably that they continue to exist as both
photons and waves. Photons don't only exist at the creation of a wave.


--
Roger Hayter

On 9/7/2015 3:54 PM, Roger Hayter wrote:
gareth wrote:

"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
...

You come a little late to this discussion. Perhaps you would like to
explain, on the basis of your theory that there are two kinds of
electromagnetic radiation based on the means of their generation,

I do not have such a theory.

Both are the same type whether generated continuously or photonically.

From which it folllows inevitably that they continue to exist as both
photons and waves. Photons don't only exist at the creation of a wave.

Really? You do realize you are having a conversation with the
equivalent of the village idiot? He is never going to say, "Oh, I see.
That makes sense." or "Thanks for that. It was helpful." He is just
going to continue to spew garbage science and create a very long winded
thread about his own junk.

I was on a vacation through Nova Scotia once and stopped in a small
general store. A guy in a wheelchair in the back was obviously not
"with it". I said hi to him and waited to see if I got a response. The
two girls at the counter giggled at my attempts. The difference is you
have no reason to expect a more reasonable reply.

--

Rick

"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
...
gareth wrote:
"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
...
You come a little late to this discussion. Perhaps you would like to
explain, on the basis of your theory that there are two kinds of
electromagnetic radiation based on the means of their generation,
I do not have such a theory.
Both are the same type whether generated continuously or photonically.
From which it folllows inevitably that they continue to exist as both
photons and waves. Photons don't only exist at the creation of a wave.

Your comments add nothing apposite to the discussion.

"rickman" wrote in message
...
Really? You do realize you are having a conversation with the equivalent
of the village idiot? He is never going to say, "Oh, I see. That makes
sense." or "Thanks for that. It was helpful." He is just going to
continue to spew garbage science and create a very long winded thread
about his own junk.
I was on a vacation through Nova Scotia once and stopped in a small
general store. A guy in a wheelchair in the back was obviously not "with
it". I said hi to him and waited to see if I got a response. The two
girls at the counter giggled at my attempts. The difference is you have
no reason to expect a more reasonable reply.

The very sort of childish contribution to be expected from someone
intellectually
challenged.

Grow up there, OM.

gareth wrote:

"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
...
gareth wrote:
"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
...
You come a little late to this discussion. Perhaps you would like to
explain, on the basis of your theory that there are two kinds of
electromagnetic radiation based on the means of their generation,
I do not have such a theory.
Both are the same type whether generated continuously or photonically.
From which it folllows inevitably that they continue to exist as both
photons and waves. Photons don't only exist at the creation of a wave.

Your comments add nothing apposite to the discussion.

Having made the (conclusive, whether you regard it as 'apposite' or not)
main point I shan't discuss it with you further.

--
Roger Hayter

"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
...
gareth wrote:
"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
...
gareth wrote:
"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
...
You come a little late to this discussion. Perhaps you would like
to
explain, on the basis of your theory that there are two kinds of
electromagnetic radiation based on the means of their generation,
I do not have such a theory.
Both are the same type whether generated continuously or photonically.
From which it folllows inevitably that they continue to exist as both
photons and waves. Photons don't only exist at the creation of a
wave.
Your comments add nothing apposite to the discussion.
Having made the (conclusive, whether you regard it as 'apposite' or not)
main point I shan't discuss it with you further.

Then, just as does M3OSN, you run away when faced with discussion.