| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
August 15th 04, 04:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Yuri, your criticism is perfectly sound.
To sum up, the key to antenna radiating efficiency is SIMPLICITY. The more simple the construction of an antenna the more efficient it will be. It is intuitivly obvious. Every complication is sure to introduce loss. --- Reg |
|
#2
August 15th 04, 04:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg Edwards wrote:
The more simple the construction of an antenna the more efficient it will be. An isotropic is pretty simple but I don't know how to feed it. :-) -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#3
August 15th 04, 10:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Reg Edwards wrote: The more simple the construction of an antenna the more efficient it will be. An isotropic is pretty simple but I don't know how to feed it. :-) From the inside. Ed wb6wsn |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| HF Vertical design(s) | Antenna | |||
| Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
