Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is an audio file of an interview with Robert Vincent; it's the
second on the list. Click on the "Lofi" button and play with RealPlayer or Windows Media Player. http://www.ampcast.com/music/11261/music.php |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Here is an audio file of an interview with Robert Vincent; it's the second on the list. Click on the "Lofi" button and play with RealPlayer or Windows Media Player. http://www.ampcast.com/music/11261/music.php yep, yep, what a comedy! This guy is a jerk, has no clue about workings of antennas. I tried to listen to this joker, but gave up after his statement that he managed (BS) to get the current accross the loaded radiator (against laws of physics) to be constant (with loading coils and helix inserted) and then he states (rightly) that efficiency of the antenna is proportional to the integrated current curve. Then the miracle: his shortened antenna of about 1/3 length over 1/4 wave vertical has the same effciency as (2/3 longer, rest of the curve) full size radiator. Shorter curve - same area? Clueless in .... Looks like the cafeteria technician and physics department of URI are on the same wavelength as "Done" Rather. Giving amateurs and University bad name, setting themselves as a target for ridicule. I am glad I didn't send my kids to URI :-) Oh well, Yuri, K3BU.us |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
With time, it is clear that the magnitude of the claimed novelty, versus the
reality, is an unfortunate case of lack of information --this is my opinion-- based upon factual errors stated, and said, by Rob. He most certainly is not "a jerk". Seems like a sincere and dedicated fellow who has worked very hard on a very challenging problem. I regret that he has not made a sufficient case regarding novelty nor efficiency nor widebandedness: again--this is my opinion. There is little that may be gleaned, moving forward, in the realm of antenna science: spurts in the past decade have, at least, milked the basic science dry. There is still fertile ground for application, a rich and satisfying endeavor upon which many here focus with rigour. 73, Chip N1IR |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
With time, it is clear that the magnitude of the claimed novelty, versus the
reality, is an unfortunate case of lack of information ... based upon factual errors stated... He most certainly is not "a jerk". I believe his jerkiness is confirmed by his silly threats regarding patent infringement. We've seen it before. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
HF Vertical design(s) | Antenna | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna |