| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
August 15th 04, 04:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Reg Edwards wrote:
The more simple the construction of an antenna the more efficient it will be. An isotropic is pretty simple but I don't know how to feed it. :-) -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#2
August 15th 04, 10:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Reg Edwards wrote: The more simple the construction of an antenna the more efficient it will be. An isotropic is pretty simple but I don't know how to feed it. :-) From the inside. Ed wb6wsn |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| HF Vertical design(s) | Antenna | |||
| Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
