Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Solder Joints in Transmitting Loop Antennas
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:58:38 -0400, rickman wrote:
So what is the big deal of insisting solid metal loops are a "must" for a high efficiency transmitting loop antenna rather than soldered sections? Paranoia. See: http://www.nonstopsystems.com/radio/frank_radio_antenna_magloop.htm There's quite a bit of useful info on building magnetic loops. One interesting comment was: UPDATE 24-Feb-2012: one and a half year after construction, I have used a professional milliohm meter (HP 4328A) to measure the DC-resistance of the copper parts of my loop (i.e., octagon + wires to the clamps): 3.2 milliohm. I also measured the resistance of a brand new round loop - without solder joints: also 3.2 milliohms. My joints are pretty good! However: I measured a DC-resistance of over 4 milliohm between the copper wires and the stainless steel clamps (i.e., 2 x 4 milliohms total). This kills the efficiency of the antenna - which I had already noticed over time. Must use a different method in my next design! I've seen the same thing with a loop I built (using an ESR meter to measure resistance). The DC resistance of mating parts is the same whether it's soldered, or just stuck together. In other words, the loop resistance doesn't change with soldering. So, what does the soldering do? One possibility is that it helps produce an unbroken surface area, which is useful when all the RF conduction is via skin effect. Unless there's some kind of dramatic change in element diameter, I don't see skin effect as a problem worthy of soldering. There's also the theory that different construction techniques produce a different loop Q. That's easy enough to measure in receive with a VSWR guesser, or in my case, a return loss bridge. However, I wanted to do it in transmit. So, I fed the transmitter with a sweep generator (with markers)[1] and looked at the return with a ferrite toroid directional coupler. A loop, before and after soldering, looked the same which I suspect means the Q is also the same. My guess(tm) is that soldering improves the mechanical stability of the loop so that things do not change when the TX power is applied. I somewhat verified this guess(tm) when I found myself constantly retuning a press fit and duct tape loop made from overpriced copper. The copper would expand when hot while transmitting, which would put some stress on the solder. The solder is soft, so it moves, thus changing the tuning. Had I braze or weld the connection instead of soldering, it would have been somewhat stronger, moved less, and probably require less retuning. I'm not sure about silver solder versus ordinary unleaded solder. I haven't done any testing here. Silver solder is much strong than regular Sn-Cu solder which produces a stiffer joing. In short, all soldering and welding does is add some desperately needed mechanical rigidity. [1] Hint: Don't do that on a weekend during a contest. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WWVH Transmitting Antennas for Time and Frequency | Shortwave | |||
beverage antennas for transmitting? | Antenna | |||
Loop Antennas | Antenna | |||
Had to fix my TS440SAT, cracked solder joints on a transistor | Homebrew | |||
PRO-2004 Dry Solder Joints | Scanner |