"rickman" wrote in message
...

Unfortunately there are some who have legitimate gripes with Gareth.

Untrue.
Those who he has sought to harm.

I have never sought to harm anybody. I have, however, used the Internet
to assert the right of reply when that same Internet has been used to
blacken my name.

They feel compelled to share their trouble in no small part to warn
others how dangerous he can be.

I am not dangerous. I am a peace-loving pacifist. Are you making this up as
you go along?

Then there are others who just can't resist piling on because it is fun.

We agree on one thing

Then there is the ongoing discussion of how to deal with him.

No-one who is decent and proper and endeavouring to promote these
NGs as technical fora needs to be "dealt with".

Perahps it is a discredit to you that you have sided with the gratuitously
abusive children?

On Sat, 05 Dec 2015 16:16:55 +0000, gareth wrote:

"rickman" wrote in message
...

Unfortunately there are some who have legitimate gripes with Gareth.

Untrue.
Those who he has sought to harm.

I have never sought to harm anybody. I have, however, used the Internet
to assert the right of reply when that same Internet has been used to
blacken my name.

It's a real travesty of justice that the judge didn't agree with you,
Gareth.

"This email was sent with the sole intent of getting Mr Reay removed from
his position because you and you alone deemed him to be unsuitable as a
teacher. In that sense this was offensive to Mr Reay. "

He even went as far as suggesting that you're not of "right mind"

"This is childish, humorous banter that no one in their right mind would
take seriously. "

How are the preparations for the appeal coming along, Gareth? You haven't
mentioned it in quite some time.