Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Electric fields in conductors
It is claimed that an electric field cannot exist in a conductor,
giving rise to such things as Faraday Cages, but supposing an applied electric field was so large that there would be insufficient mobile charges available to be able to neutralise that field within a conductor? This would surely affect our theories about wave guides and co-axial cables, would it not? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Electric fields in conductors
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:04:56 +0000, gareth wrote:
It is claimed that an electric field cannot exist in a conductor, giving rise to such things as Faraday Cages, but supposing an applied electric field was so large that there would be insufficient mobile charges available to be able to neutralise that field within a conductor? This would surely affect our theories about wave guides and co-axial cables, would it not? -------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Electric fields in conductors
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote:
It is claimed that an electric field cannot exist in a conductor, giving rise to such things as Faraday Cages, but supposing an applied electric field was so large that there would be insufficient mobile charges available to be able to neutralise that field within a conductor? In which case the conductor would begin to increase in temperature and in an extreme case either melt or vaporize. This would surely affect our theories about wave guides and co-axial cables, would it not? No, it would not effect any theory but it would effect the job status of anyone stupid enough to design such a thing. -- Jim Pennino |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Electric fields in conductors
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Electric fields in conductors
On 13/02/2016 21:06, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artículo , escribió: No, it would not effect any theory but it would effect the job status of anyone stupid enough to design such a thing. If you're going to accuse anyone of stupidity (although you are quite correct in the case of the OP), it would be wise to learn the difference between 'affect' and 'effect'. As in the 'effect' of setting a FU without having the courtesy to announce it in the message? [fu reset] -- Mouse. Where Morse meets House. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Electric fields in conductors
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artÃ*culo , escribió: No, it would not effect any theory but it would effect the job status of anyone stupid enough to design such a thing. If you're going to accuse anyone of stupidity (although you are quite correct in the case of the OP), it would be wise to learn the difference between 'affect' and 'effect'. You don't think I actually spend any time on such as this to do proof reading for common typos like affect/effect, to/too, its/it's, etc. do you? -- Jim Pennino |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Electric fields in conductors
En el artículo , A. non
Eyemouse escribió: As in the 'effect' of setting a FU without having the courtesy to announce it in the message? You managed to read the headers, others can. [fu reset] Reset. -- (\_/) (='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke! (")_(") |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Electric fields in conductors
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Skin Thickness, RF penetration into conductors. | Shortwave | |||
There are 3 coaxial conductors. | Antenna | |||
electric & magnetic fields ?? | Antenna | |||
ladder line position wrt conductors? | Antenna | |||
Electric and Magnetic fields | Antenna |