Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We had just replaced the battery in the collar Sunday night. We think we just didn't train them as long as they needed to be trained to understand to go back when it beeps and not go through the barrier.
We've disconnected the power to the transmitter so that, in the off chance that she returns, she doesn't get buzzed when she approaches the boundary. We can definitely put power to it in our vehicle or in our home if there is possibly a way to locate her using it. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ALisha Hohman wrote:
We had just replaced the battery in the collar Sunday night. We think we just didn't train them as long as they needed to be trained to understand to go back when it beeps and not go through the barrier. We've disconnected the power to the transmitter so that, in the off chance that she returns, she doesn't get buzzed when she approaches the boundary. We can definitely put power to it in our vehicle or in our home if there is possibly a way to locate her using it. I would think when you make a big loop of wire or other material with wire attached to it (as big as you can handle, say 3-4 feet across), and connect that to the transmitter, it can be used to locate the transponders. Check that on the other transponder. But it will probably not work more than a few feet away, just like in the original setup, so it is unclear how useful that is. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is a wireless transmitter, but that would probably work with the wired system since that's the method used to check to see if the transponder is functioning correctly.
I emailed the company Petsafe to ask if there was a way to find her using it and was told no, so it seems I'm going to have to hope she just shows up or is found. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ALisha Hohman wrote:
It is a wireless transmitter, but that would probably work with the wired system since that's the method used to check to see if the transponder is functioning correctly. A wireless transmitter? Those virtual fences normally use a buried wire to define the boundaries of the area the pet is allowed to be in. Is that not the case with your system? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nope. It doesn't use any wires. It creates an up to 90ft radius around wherever the transmitter is placed. If you look further up the thread, I posted the product page from home depot's website.
|
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ALisha Hohman wrote:
Nope. It doesn't use any wires. It creates an up to 90ft radius around wherever the transmitter is placed. If you look further up the thread, I posted the product page from home depot's website. I would think such a system can never have a clearly defined boundary unless it uses advanced techniques like roundtrip time measurement of a radio signal. The "range" of the signal depends a lot on obstacles etc. In this configuration it should be able to locate the dog in a 90ft radius, but that is of course not very helpful when you want to locate it in a neighborhood. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes. The boundary line is tentative and depends on the dog learning to recognize the been to know it is near the boundary line. You can use boundary flags as a visual aid as well, but, you are right. If we were to move something in our house it would change the boundary.
Yes. We did drive with it in our van on the end of our road where we know no one else has one of the systems to see if she was still alive and within range, but we don't want to do that in areas we are unfamiliar with where someone could have the same unit and risk a pet getting buzzed for no reason when a child is playing near it. We were relying on hearing her yipe when she was within and then back out of range. The point of my post was to find out if we could detect when the collar came in and back out of range (when she would be getting buzzed) if she is injured or otherwise unable to yipe since this unit does not have that feature. Since I am limited in my knowledge about how radios work, I thought someone here would be able to tell me if there is a way to detect when the transmitter comes in/out of range of the receiver collar, even if we could only be able to search up to around 90 ft in each direction. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim H wrote:
On 21 Jul 2016 16:33:11 GMT, in , Rob wrote: ALisha Hohman wrote: Nope. It doesn't use any wires. It creates an up to 90ft radius around wherever the transmitter is placed. If you look further up the thread, I posted the product page from home depot's website. I would think such a system can never have a clearly defined boundary unless it uses advanced techniques like roundtrip time measurement of a radio signal. The "range" of the signal depends a lot on obstacles etc. In this configuration it should be able to locate the dog in a 90ft radius, but that is of course not very helpful when you want to locate it in a neighborhood. No! The collar is receive only. When the dog gets outside the range of the transmitter the collar sounds a tone and shocks the dog until the signal is again received or for 30 seconds, whichever is greater. It's all in that manual she posted a link to. I thought the collar would beep loudly whenever it gets out of range, so it would be possible to force it to beep by trigger that beeping action using the portable transmitter. As there has been discussion of such a system before that operated using a buried wire loop around the area to be protected, I thought a "portable" loop could be made and carried around. However later she explained this beep is only faint (maybe mainly ultrasonic) so this would not be a practical approach. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DX'ing and Invisible Pet Fence | Shortwave | |||
How reject QRM from the fence ? | Antenna | |||
On The Fence | Shortwave | |||
chain link fence | Antenna | |||
Maxtel wireless Inc/Talk Wireless Inc. In Niagara Region | Scanner |