Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Old Ed, it's pretty easy, just did it myself, you just need to setup a
message rule.......... -Go to menu Tools/Message Rules/News -On the New News Rule checkoff in the following boxes to setup a new rule: -1) Where the From line contains people -2) Delete it -3) click the Contains People link -type in the name of the offending sender, then Add, then OK -couple more OK's to close all the windows and put the settings into effect (you can repeat the above to add more names too) Have fun, you can add, modify, delete as many rules as you like. The next time you access the group you will not see any *new* posts from that person. 73, John "Old Ed" wrote in message ink.net... But for someone who comes on an amateur radio forum to gloat over the probable destruction of the HF radio spectrum, I'll make an exception. Will someone please tell me how to "killfile" this F***ING STUPID TROLL? I haven't quite figured out how to do it in OE6. (That will also save me from feeding this Troll, which I'm afraid I just did.) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(nt)
|
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Go to tools, message rules, Blocked Senders List, News Rules, and check
the approapriate sections. works fine... de Jer... "Old Ed" wrote in message ink.net... But for someone who comes on an amateur radio forum to gloat over the probable destruction of the HF radio spectrum, I'll make an exception. Will someone please tell me how to "killfile" this F***ING STUPID TROLL? I haven't quite figured out how to do it in OE6. (That will also save me from feeding this Troll, which I'm afraid I just did.) Thanks... "Fractenna" wrote in message ... For those who don't know it yet, the FCC approved modifications to Part 15 regarding BPL. This is an extraordinary example of the FCC being both responsive to the --need-for new technologies and innovative spectrum use, while invoking new guidelines and requirements to assure dual use between licensed and unlicensed users. I agree with Mr. Powell's assessment that it was a "banner day". The FCC did a spectacular job! But, if you've followed my comments, you knew that this was my prediction for some time... 73, Chip N1IR |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Fractenna"
...regarding BPL. BPL sucks. Why use HF spectrum when there is so much other, more suitable and much wider, spectrum available way up the bands? Between improved DSL (higher speed, much farther, as being implemented in the UK), Cable, WildBlue (satellite), and soon Wi-Max (35km, 56Mbps), BPL will be nothing more than a footnote. In the future, some of those HF users being bothered by BPL might stoop to doing a quick 'sweep' across the bands. This would cause the BPL DSP algorithms to think that all frequencies are in local use thus lock-out ALL the frequency bins and effectively shut down the link for several minutes. BPL is a REALLY stupid concept. Obviously the HF signal is going to leak out (and other HF is going to leak in). Dumb. Power lines aren't exactly twisted pair (close, but no cigar). BPL has about as much future as Fractal Antennas (none). |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BPL has about as much future as Fractal Antennas (none).
"Fractenna" I couldn't agree more. Yes, "none". I'm glad that we agree on this point. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BPL has about as much future as Fractal Antennas (none).
"Fractenna" I couldn't agree more. Yes, "none". I'm glad that we agree on this point. If you mean that fractal antennas have no impact on your life, I take this as axiomatic. I repeat, I agree that BPL has about as much future as fractal antennas. I agree heartily; both have bright futures indeed! 73, Chip N1IR |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Didn't someone said that if you argue with idiot, you might look like one, or
it is hard to tell who is? Troll, trollll, trolllll BUm |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Noname" wrote in message ... BPL has about as much future as Fractal Antennas (none). "Fractenna" I couldn't agree more. Yes, "none". I'm glad that we agree on this point. Guess it depends on your definition of "none". g Ed wb6wsn |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guess it depends on your definition of "none". g
Ed Don't follow...what is context? 73, Chip N1IR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|