Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 16th 04, 03:45 PM
- XC -
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Old Ed, it's pretty easy, just did it myself, you just need to setup a
message rule..........

-Go to menu Tools/Message Rules/News
-On the New News Rule checkoff in the following boxes to setup a new rule:
-1) Where the From line contains people
-2) Delete it
-3) click the Contains People link

-type in the name of the offending sender, then Add, then OK
-couple more OK's to close all the windows and put the settings into effect
(you can repeat the above to add more names too)

Have fun, you can add, modify, delete as many rules as you like.
The next time you access the group you will not see any *new* posts from
that person.

73,
John





"Old Ed" wrote in message
ink.net...
But for someone who comes on an amateur radio forum to gloat over
the probable destruction of the HF radio spectrum, I'll make an exception.

Will someone please tell me how to "killfile" this F***ING STUPID
TROLL? I haven't quite figured out how to do it in OE6. (That will
also save me from feeding this Troll, which I'm afraid I just did.)



  #2   Report Post  
Old October 16th 04, 09:33 PM
Old Ed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(nt)


  #3   Report Post  
Old October 16th 04, 11:45 PM
Jer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Go to tools, message rules, Blocked Senders List, News Rules, and check
the approapriate sections. works fine...

de Jer...

"Old Ed" wrote in message
ink.net...
But for someone who comes on an amateur radio forum to gloat over
the probable destruction of the HF radio spectrum, I'll make an exception.

Will someone please tell me how to "killfile" this F***ING STUPID
TROLL? I haven't quite figured out how to do it in OE6. (That will
also save me from feeding this Troll, which I'm afraid I just did.)

Thanks...

"Fractenna" wrote in message
...
For those who don't know it yet, the FCC approved modifications to Part
15
regarding BPL.

This is an extraordinary example of the FCC being both responsive to the
--need-for new technologies and innovative spectrum use, while invoking

new
guidelines and requirements to assure dual use between licensed and

unlicensed
users.

I agree with Mr. Powell's assessment that it was a "banner day". The FCC

did a
spectacular job!

But, if you've followed my comments, you knew that this was my prediction

for
some time...

73,
Chip N1IR





  #4   Report Post  
Old October 15th 04, 07:48 PM
Noname
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Fractenna"
...regarding BPL.


BPL sucks.

Why use HF spectrum when there is so much other, more suitable and much
wider, spectrum available way up the bands? Between improved DSL (higher
speed, much farther, as being implemented in the UK), Cable, WildBlue
(satellite), and soon Wi-Max (35km, 56Mbps), BPL will be nothing more than a
footnote.

In the future, some of those HF users being bothered by BPL might stoop to
doing a quick 'sweep' across the bands. This would cause the BPL DSP
algorithms to think that all frequencies are in local use thus lock-out ALL
the frequency bins and effectively shut down the link for several minutes.

BPL is a REALLY stupid concept. Obviously the HF signal is going to leak
out (and other HF is going to leak in). Dumb. Power lines aren't exactly
twisted pair (close, but no cigar).

BPL has about as much future as Fractal Antennas (none).



  #5   Report Post  
Old October 15th 04, 07:53 PM
Fractenna
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BPL has about as much future as Fractal Antennas

I couldn't agree more.

73,
Chip N1IR


  #6   Report Post  
Old October 15th 04, 08:37 PM
Noname
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BPL has about as much future as Fractal Antennas (none).

"Fractenna"
I couldn't agree more.


Yes, "none".

I'm glad that we agree on this point.



  #7   Report Post  
Old October 15th 04, 10:06 PM
Fractenna
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BPL has about as much future as Fractal Antennas (none).

"Fractenna"
I couldn't agree more.


Yes, "none".

I'm glad that we agree on this point.


If you mean that fractal antennas have no impact on your life, I take this as
axiomatic.

I repeat, I agree that BPL has about as much future as fractal antennas. I
agree heartily; both have bright futures indeed!

73,
Chip N1IR
  #8   Report Post  
Old October 16th 04, 05:06 AM
Yuri Blanarovich
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Didn't someone said that if you argue with idiot, you might look like one, or
it is hard to tell who is?

Troll, trollll, trolllll

BUm
  #9   Report Post  
Old October 15th 04, 11:47 PM
Ed Price
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Noname" wrote in message
...
BPL has about as much future as Fractal Antennas (none).


"Fractenna"
I couldn't agree more.


Yes, "none".

I'm glad that we agree on this point.





Guess it depends on your definition of "none". g


Ed
wb6wsn

  #10   Report Post  
Old October 15th 04, 11:54 PM
Fractenna
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Guess it depends on your definition of "none". g


Ed


Don't follow...what is context?

73,
Chip N1IR


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017