Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 3rd 04, 05:46 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 01:17:33 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:
In XP, I clicked Tools/Options then selected the Security tab. Unchecked the
"Do not allow attachments to be saved or opened..."


Hi John,

You are now standing at the edge of the abyss.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 4th 04, 03:31 AM
Tom Ring
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 01:17:33 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

In XP, I clicked Tools/Options then selected the Security tab. Unchecked the
"Do not allow attachments to be saved or opened..."



Hi John,

You are now standing at the edge of the abyss.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


As someone with well over 10000 customers, I can assure you that Richard
is correct.

There was also announced today, an exploit that doesn't even need you to
click on it if you run, gasp!, Microsoft clients.

Here is the link to the story-

http://software.silicon.com/security...9125549,00.htm

and here is a link to the slashdot discussion of it -

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?si...id=201&tid=218

I also have to admit that the exploit needs a dummy on the receiving end
to complete the circuit by having poor judgement/settings. They may be
able to write it to be better yet, though, and I'm hoping against hope, not.

tom
K0TAR
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 4th 04, 08:12 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Ring" wrote in message
. ..
Richard Clark wrote:

On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 01:17:33 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

In XP, I clicked Tools/Options then selected the Security tab. Unchecked
the "Do not allow attachments to be saved or opened..."



Hi John,

You are now standing at the edge of the abyss.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


As someone with well over 10000 customers, I can assure you that Richard
is correct.

There was also announced today, an exploit that doesn't even need you to
click on it if you run, gasp!, Microsoft clients.

Here is the link to the story-

http://software.silicon.com/security...9125549,00.htm

and here is a link to the slashdot discussion of it -

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?si...id=201&tid=218

I also have to admit that the exploit needs a dummy on the receiving end
to complete the circuit by having poor judgement/settings. They may be
able to write it to be better yet, though, and I'm hoping against hope,
not.

tom
K0TAR


Thanks, Richard and Tom, for your concern. I forgot to say that I
immediately turned that feature back on.

I also use Poptray to examine any mail before actually downloading with OE.
It's amazing how easy it is to spot unwanted emails.

73,
John


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parallel balun problem with wire loop loopfan Antenna 7 March 23rd 04 09:36 PM
Adding a 2:1 balun to a multi-band dipole Larry Gauthier \(K8UT\) Antenna 4 February 5th 04 06:22 AM
Balun design / SWR ? Wolfgang K. Meister Antenna 8 February 4th 04 06:34 PM
Horizontal loop - balun or no balun ? Per Enocson Antenna 5 December 14th 03 01:28 AM
Balun Grounding Question ? Robert11 Antenna 6 November 23rd 03 09:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017