Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I offer a third third response.
On p. 175, Chipman states: "Equation (8.27) demonstrates explicitly that the shape of a standing wave pattern representing |V(d)| as a function of d on a transmission line is in no way affected by the quantities Vs, Zs and [rho]s at the source." And equation 8.29 on p. 176, the calculation of reflection coefficient, contains no source-dependent terms. I'm sure that somewhere in the book, the author derives SWR in terms of reflection coefficient. These are the facts: 1. The SWR, positions of the standing waves, reflection coefficient seen looking into the line, impedance seen looking into the line, and dB line loss are independent of source impedance. 2. The actual amount of power delivered to a line for a given Thevenin source voltage will, of course, depend on the source impedance, just as it would if the source were directly connected to a load. Therefore, the absolute amount of power dissipated in the load depends on source impedance. The dB line loss, however, doesn't. Also, the length of time the line requires to reach equilibrium after initially turning on the source depends on the source impedance. These can be found, explicitly stated and/or in easily interpreted equation form, in a host of references. I see nothing in the text Wes has kindly posted which contradicts these facts, and I'm sure there's nothing elsewhere in the text that does. I often have a hard time understanding Richard's postings, so it's possible that he's not disagreeing with the statements I've made, either. If so, I apologize for the misinterpretation. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Richard Clark wrote: On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:27:37 -0700, Wes Stewart wrote: I did it anyway. [g] Hope this covers it: http://users.triconet.org/wesandlind...rdClarkRef.pdf Hi Wes, Thanx very much. I can see one of two results from this general availability. The readership here can: 1. Avoid it in stunned shame (the embarrassment in coming of age); 2. Accept it as a remarkable revelation (because it's on the web). I would hope for a third response from those who could argue what follows from these first principles, but the lazier ones would complain of my "attitude" and hobble back to their beauty contests on their crutches. ;-) To quote one of my favorite authors, Raymond Chandler, when in "The Big Sleep" Doghouse Reilly is admonished about the same defect, he avers "I don't mind if you don't like my manners. They're pretty bad. I grieve over them during the long winter evenings." 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna |