LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
Old December 7th 04, 03:37 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John
I read that link with great interest. Some years back I saw an article
where twinlead was constructed out of coaxial cable for the purpose of
running it through environments that would be bad news for normal
twinlead. I thought it was rather stupid because the loss on such a
line would defeat the whole purpose of using twinlead. However, for my
purposes where I just need a couple of feet or less to be in close
contact with other cableing, this might work. The question is, why
then are remote baluns promoted as the solution to this common problem?
And, is the coax twinlead and a balnaced tuner a better choice than a
short lenght of very low loss coax, a good current balun, and a T
match?
I am not trying to be difficult, I just want to set this up as
efficinetly as possible. This might actually be the key! I just need
to know if I should go with a short section of coaxial twinlead and a
balanced tuner...or leave well enough alone.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Additional Line Losses Due to SWR Robert Lay W9DMK Antenna 194 December 9th 04 12:30 AM
Ladder line question ???? Bob Antenna 2 April 24th 04 04:54 AM
ladder line J-pole question Dustin Antenna 1 March 25th 04 04:36 PM
MFJ-974H Balanced Line Tuner Ed Antenna 18 November 14th 03 05:11 PM
Complex line Z0: A numerical example Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 September 13th 03 01:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017