Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"A ham I knpe uses parallel runs of RG 62 as a compromise. That gives him a characteristic impedance of 186 ohms for his 30 foot underground section." Yes. It`s balanced to ground and has twice the characteristic impedance of a single run of coax. In the case of twin runs of RG 82, that is twice a value of 93 ohms, or 186 ohms, center conductor to center conductor. I recall analog microwave radios which had their baseband signals wired with twin runs for each direction of transmission like that to obtain a shielded and balanced baseband system. It must have been good for the coax business and it made for a quiet radio too. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I like the welding idea but sold my arc welder b4 moving to the new house
:-( I've been playing with an end fed 100' wire antenna and it seems to work pretty well and is nearly invisible to boot. I've got access to trees maybe 200, 300 feet out. Just need to pick up a wristrocket. Bob "'Doc" wrote in message ... Bob, The 'quick'n'dirty' answer is don't waste your time burying the ladder line. If you have to bury a feed line make it coax (one of the reasons it was invented, to be able to run it close to 'stuff', or ground). Still want to try it? Then why not. The losses may be acceptible to you (sort of doubt that, but...), and it would be an interesting experiment. 'Doc ALTERNATIVE #1 Take up metal welding 'scupture'. Build a huge ~ugly~ thingy in the backyard. Hang dipole over the top of it (call it a lightning protection device). 'They' will be so upset over the 'sculpture' they'll never even see the dipole. Invest in a good divorce attorney. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Additional Line Losses Due to SWR | Antenna | |||
Question running balanced line | Antenna | |||
MFJ-974H Balanced Line Tuner | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna |