On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:34:31 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
I have the advantage here. I could be wrong. I could be shown to be
in error in my reading of Chipman. It hasn't happened. There are
many here who hold copies of his work. There are none who dispute my
recitation at any specific point, nor do they offer statements in his
text expressed by him contradicting my interpretation. My advantage
is that so many here are either lazy if I am wrong, or worse, too
ashamed if I am right. And for such a small matter too. ;-)

Your biggest problem is that you absolutely refuse to allow anyone to
agree with you.

Hi Cecil,

The only complaint is the poor quality of such support. I would
prefer more robust coverage than the cut-and-paste variety. Clearly
you fail to even achieve a modicum of similitude to my thesis by
instead re-phrasing it in your own unnecessary elaborations that spin
off the wall into this "model" that proves you wrong (or so Tam would
have us believe). I see you offering no compelling rebuttal to him,
so the quality of effort, consistent with weak snippages from eminent
texts, is poor as I said.

If this is my biggest problem, it doesn't originate from me, but is
imposed upon me.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC