| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Leder wrote: As it sits, I'm inclined to let well enough alone and stick with the simple dipole, unless I can be convinced otherwise. That's probably what I would do. In most cases like that, I prefer the dipoles over the loops...Why? Cuz in general, more of the current will be up at that apex height, than the loop, which usually will have to have wires dropping lower to the ground, in order to fit. If I've got 35-40 ft of height, I prefer to keep the antenna currents at that height. If you have a delta loop, or any other, usually the bottom will be fairly close to the ground. More ground loss, and in general less effective than having it all at 35-40 ft...The small increase in broadside gain hardly seems worth it to me. Usually, it's hardly noticable...If I wanted gain, I'd run parallel dipoles phased, or something along those lines... I know you don't have the room, but a simple EDZ is more effective than a loop, as far as the broadside gain..And you can keep it all up high...An EDZ on 30m would be about 96 ft or so total length.. Anyway, I don't think the loops would be a drastic improvement, if much at all...But that's just my $2.31 worth... MK |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| help with better macthing system on delta loop than gamma macth | Equipment | |||
| help with better macthing system on delta loop than gamma macth | Equipment | |||
| help with better macthing system on delta loop than gamma macth | Equipment | |||
| Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Should I run a Sky-wire loop? | Dx | |||