Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:47:02 -0700, Richard Clark
wrote: By this (classical design), the work revealed in full sized, folded dipoles (and monopoles) teaches that the size ratio of the two elements (in this case approximated by the radiator and the gamma element), and their proximity, yield a step-up or step-down relationship in drive point Z (depending on which, larger or smaller, is being driven). This is like conventional transformer winding ratios, except in RF it is embodied in diameters and separation with complex results (not as simple as counting turns and being done with it). This is further complicated by the structure not being a classic folded design - I am merely extending the metaphor, returning this to nutshell theory. Hi All, For others following my strained metaphors, consult Johnson and Jasik's "Antenna Engineering Handbook," "Impedance Transformation as a Function of the Ratio of Conductor Sizes" (pg. 4-17 of the second edition). This topic has always been confined to full sized folded quarterwave monopoles or halfwave dipoles and I have not observed any equal (that is, comprehensive) treatment given in terms of T or Gamma matches. Of course, there may be every reason why such has never been done. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
please need help with delta loop antenna better matching system than gamma match | Antenna | |||
Problem with Gamma Match? | Antenna | |||
Gamma match question 6-meter yagi | Antenna | |||
Gamma Match | Antenna | |||
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? | Antenna |