RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   Reflector Vs Director (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/70696-reflector-vs-director.html)

Richard Clark May 13th 05 03:31 PM

On Fri, 13 May 2005 07:21:42 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
if the conjugate mirror involves RF waves

As I said, an unnecessary elaboration (it is redundant);
you would see nothing.

Yes.

....Why?

Cecil Moore May 13th 05 03:32 PM

Asimov wrote:
These are photons that exist too briefly to be
detected. Spacetime is not an empty vacuum but is a frothing of energy
and virtual particles of all kinds.


Heh, heh, the more things change, the more they remain the
same. From "Worldbook 2001": "Ether ... could not be seen,
felt, or weighed and was present in vacuums, ..."
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Fred W4JLE May 13th 05 03:59 PM

Has to do with the spinning of this marble we live on. At the equator which
direction does the water rotate.?

It also affects the whorrels in your hair pattern and the directions beans
grow up a stick. What happens to pole beans at the equator?

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Cecil:

It that mirror or yours working correctly? Did you try hanging it upside
down? You don't live below the equator do you? Cause, yanno, water spins
one way going down a drain in the northern, opposite in the
southern--somethin' 'bout gravity--or the warping of the ether... grin

Warmest regards,
John
--
Sit down the six-pack!!! STEP AWAY!!! ...and go do something...

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
| Jim Kelley wrote:
| the person I see in the mirror appears to be right handed.
|
| Hey Jim, if a mirror reverses left and right,
| why doesn't it also reverse up and down? :-)
| --
| 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
|
|
| ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
| http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
| ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---





Fred W4JLE May 13th 05 04:00 PM

You would see nothing.

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 12 May 2005 19:23:55 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Please specify the system.

Further elaboration is unnecessary.




Fred W4JLE May 13th 05 04:01 PM

Waves are exactly equal and opposite and cancel.

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 13 May 2005 07:21:42 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
if the conjugate mirror involves RF waves

As I said, an unnecessary elaboration (it is redundant);
you would see nothing.

Yes.

...Why?




Cecil Moore May 13th 05 04:19 PM

Richard Clark wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
if the conjugate mirror involves RF waves
you would see nothing.


Yes.

...Why?


Because human eyes cannot detect RF? :-)

A source impedance of 100+j100 ohms ensuring 100 volts
at the source output terminal to a load impedance of
100-j100 ohms through one wavelength of lossless 50 ohm
coax is conjugately matched.

A source impedance of 50 ohms ensuring 100 volts at
the source output terminal to a load impedance of 100-j100
ohms through one wavelength of lossless 50 ohm coax is
not conjugately matched.

All conditions of voltage, current, and power external to
the source output terminal are identical in both cases,
i.e. making only passive measurements, one cannot tell
the difference between a conjugate match and a mismatch.
Except for a minor effect on my power bill, I fail to see
what the hullabaloo (concerning conjugate matching) is
all about.
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Cecil Moore May 13th 05 04:34 PM

Fred W4JLE wrote:
Has to do with the spinning of this marble we live on.


Called the "Coriolis Effect". In the Northern Hemisphere,
relative to the axis of rotation, points toward the north
move slower than points to the south. If we lived on a
cylinder rather than a sphere, we probably wouldn't have
any hurricanes.

Say, since math models seem to be able to dictate reality,
wouldn't a simple transformation from spherical coordinates
to cylindrical coordinates stop the hurricanes?
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

John Smith May 13th 05 04:57 PM

Oh yeah, everyone is familiar with that explaination, oxygen being slightly
magnetic is responding to the earths magnetic field. And, being closer to
one pole is more likely to spin in one direction--when closer to another
pole the opposite... actually, I accept this--I didn't think anyone would
miss it was being used as a "joke"... when you have to explain the jokes,
it is just not the same... frown

Regards,
John
--
Sit down the six-pack!!! STEP AWAY!!! ...and go do something...

"Fred W4JLE" wrote in message
...
| Has to do with the spinning of this marble we live on. At the equator
which
| direction does the water rotate.?
|
| It also affects the whorrels in your hair pattern and the directions beans
| grow up a stick. What happens to pole beans at the equator?
|
| "John Smith" wrote in message
| ...
| Cecil:
|
| It that mirror or yours working correctly? Did you try hanging it
upside
| down? You don't live below the equator do you? Cause, yanno, water
spins
| one way going down a drain in the northern, opposite in the
| southern--somethin' 'bout gravity--or the warping of the ether... grin
|
| Warmest regards,
| John
| --
| Sit down the six-pack!!! STEP AWAY!!! ...and go do something...
|
| "Cecil Moore" wrote in message
| ...
| | Jim Kelley wrote:
| | the person I see in the mirror appears to be right handed.
| |
| | Hey Jim, if a mirror reverses left and right,
| | why doesn't it also reverse up and down? :-)
| | --
| | 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
| |
| |
| | ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
| News==----
| | http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
100,000

| Newsgroups
| | ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
|
|
|
|



Jim Kelley May 13th 05 05:53 PM



Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2005 07:21:42 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

if the conjugate mirror involves RF waves


As I said, an unnecessary elaboration (it is redundant);

you would see nothing.


Yes.


Please cite your reference for this 'conjugate mirror'.

Thank you.

ac6xg


Cecil Moore May 13th 05 06:07 PM

Jim Kelley wrote:
Please cite your reference for this 'conjugate mirror'.


In "Reflections", Walt has a chapter entitled "Into the
Conjugate Mirror" or something like that.
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com