Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
"Old Ed" wrote Presumably, the reference antennas against which the G5RV is called a "compromise" are full-sized dipoles for the respective bands. IF the G5RV can come reasonably close to those (and many users seem to think it can), Can 250,000 housewives be wrong? Of course they can! Reg, I just modeled the half-sized G5RV using EZNEC. The dipole is 3/2WL on 10m and the twinlead is 1/2WL on 10m. EZNEC reports the following 50 ohm SWRs at the twinlead/coax junction. 10m - 2.0:1, 20m - 2.7:1, 40m - 2.6:11 I would be hard pressed to tell the difference between the efficiency of a half-sized G5RV vs a resonant dipole for those three bands. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Windom vs G5RV : 1-0 | Antenna | |||
carolina windom vs dipole | Antenna | |||
G5RV vs. G5RV Jr. | Antenna | |||
G5RV or 135 foot doublet or Carolina Windom? | Antenna | |||
OCF Dipole vs. G5RV vs. Carolina Windom ??? | Antenna |