Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote:
"Roy Lewallen" wrote: As I'm sure you know, AM broadcast antennas intentionally radiate very little sky wave, and that's what amateurs need for communication beyond a few miles. Some care must be used in comparing MW broadcasting requirements and characteristics with amateur HF communications. __________________ AM broadcast station verticals have very significant energy at elevation angles that can be propagated by skywaves. As I'm sure you know, Class A AM broadcast stations have an extended geographic service area served exclusively by their nighttime skywave--many times more area than is served by their surface wave, in fact. Richard Clark's statement did not limit his conclusion to amateur HF communications. RF I'm sorry, I stand corrected. Extended coverage AM stations do indeed produce significant sky wave as you've pointed out. I was thinking only of suppression of high angle sky wave radiation to avoid fading. And you're also correct about Richard Clark's statement. Perhaps he is indeed attempting to do some MF broadcasting to his local area -- I just assumed he wasn't. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? | Equipment | |||
Have you had an FT-817 finals failure? | Equipment |