Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:46:31 GMT, "Jerry Martes" wrote: Hi Richard As you know, I have been getting good results with the high permeability ferrite tubes for decoupling the coax feed line on my balanced antenna. I bought a bunch of inexpensive ferrites that were intended for absorbing RFI, from All Electronics. Would it be practical for Kevin, the orginal poster, to get decent results with a few ferrites covering the coax where it seperates from the boom?? Hi Jerry, Sure, but you have the advantage of being able to measure the Z of those ferrites. However, buying them rummage style and hoping they will work does not always bring a satisfactory solution. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Hi Richard I realize that I place way more emphasis on "Amateur" in the HAM concept. I'm not inclined to depend on using only the best component. But, it seems that any of those ferrite tubes that were intended to be used to minimize RFI will work well at 144 MHz. So, since they are cheap and available, I thought it might be worth trying some inexpensive, high permeability tubes instead of coiling the coax into a coil. I did measure the impedance across a loop of RG 223 with 4 tubes around the outside. The problem I come up with is my ignorance of *whats needed* for adequate decoupling of the balanced antenna from the outside of the coax. I depend on you to shed light on alot of the things I try. Jerry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
antenna tuner balun question | Antenna | |||
SWR meter calibration question - hooked up backwards? | Antenna | |||
Colinear 2 meter antenna question | Antenna | |||
Balun question... | Scanner | |||
FS 4 Element 6 Meter Quad | Swap |