| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
October 6th 06, 09:24 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
|
|
#2
October 7th 06, 01:32 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Papa Dog wrote in
: In article . net, says... Thanks for posting that chuck. I've never broken any of those on the air or on usenet. Maybe now Markie and everyone else will see why CW is important. Thanks again and Keep up the good work. 73 de Slow Code You need to read them again SC. You break them daily on usenet. You're not considerate. You're down right unfriendly to some and You're about unprogressive as they come. 73 Chris You think that's bad? Wait until HF sounds 11 meters and you can't find a decent contact anywhere. You'll see I was right. I crawled out of my hole around restructuring time. Then the ARRL and FCC screwed ham radio. I went back in my hole again. Now the FCC and it appears with the blessings of the ARRL is planning to toss CW all together. I come out of my hole to fight for the integrity of ham radio once again, but when the R&O comes out eliminating CW, I'll crawl back into my hole again. Leaving you and everyone else the problem of trying to deal with poor behavior and operating practice on the bands. The result of dumbing down licensing. Outcome based education doesn't work, what makes you think outcome based licensing will? SC |
|
#4
October 12th 06, 02:01 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Papa Dog wrote in
: In article et, says... Papa Dog wrote in : In article . net, says... Thanks for posting that chuck. I've never broken any of those on the air or on usenet. Maybe now Markie and everyone else will see why CW is important. Thanks again and Keep up the good work. 73 de Slow Code You need to read them again SC. You break them daily on usenet. You're not considerate. You're down right unfriendly to some and You're about unprogressive as they come. 73 Chris You think that's bad? Wait until HF sounds 11 meters and you can't find a decent contact anywhere. You'll see I was right. I crawled out of my hole around restructuring time. Then the ARRL and FCC screwed ham radio. I went back in my hole again. Now the FCC and it appears with the blessings of the ARRL is planning to toss CW all together. I come out of my hole to fight for the integrity of ham radio once again, but when the R&O comes out eliminating CW, I'll crawl back into my hole again. Leaving you and everyone else the problem of trying to deal with poor behavior and operating practice on the bands. The result of dumbing down licensing. Outcome based education doesn't work, what makes you think outcome based licensing will? SC You still won't acknowledge your poor behavior that really hurts your cause. Chris You choosing to disagree with a pro-coder doesn't constitute poor behavior on my part. How's your code practice coming along? Are you going to stick with it, or are you going to be one of them un-skilled hams. SC |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
| Lest We Forget | Policy | |||
| Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
| Trade Modded DX-398 For Scanner | Scanner | |||
Hybrid Mode
