Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Barr ) writes:
On 7 Jan 2007 10:15:35 -0800, Nomad wrote: The relatively inexpensive Yaesu FRG-7 also uses the Wadley loop. It's an excellent performer for the price (although solid state). Somebody once wrote about them that Yaesu were so pleased at getting the Barlow-Wadley loop working in solid-state that they forgot to give the receiver any rf performance :-) There's a whole raft of mods to bring it up to scratch though... The Wadley loop is often seen in mystical terms, presumably because people aren't bothering to understand it. Obviously, it was a way in the fifties to get rid of that need for crystals every 500KHz, yet in retrospect I'm not sure that the effort couldn't have been put into a synthesizer. After all, generating a first mixer signal every 500KHz requires about the same circuitry if done with a PLL. A few years later there were receivers that used PLLs for such signals, though over the years I've seen posts where people mistake those PLLs with Wadley loops. The problem with the Wadley loop is that it puts at least an extra mixer in the signal path, and by definition you can't put ultimate selectivity until three mixers down. Done right, as I'm sure it was done in the Racal receivers, it works. But done carelessly, and you have a receiver that uses a more esoteric design but automatically comes out worse than something done a different way. After the Racal, it mostly seems to have been used to cut costs, but once you reduce costs the extra mixers in the signal path are a liability. Moving the "synthesizer" out of the signal path means you don't have that extra mixer in the signal path. And I'm not convinced that making a decent PLL that only has to generate signals every 500KHz is harder than all the filtering and isolation that the Wadley loop requires. People have confused the PLL in the HRO-500 and the mix-sixties Galaxy receiver with the Wadley loop because on some level they are similar. I've explained the Wadley loop in the past so I'm not going to explain it again, but the HRO-500 PLL used a crystal oscillator at 500KHz, generated lots of harmonics, and then the variable oscillator would be locked to the harmonic of the reference. You'd be tuning the oscillator with a manual variable capacitor, with a small varicap to actually tune it to look by the voltage out of the phase detector. There is similarity to the Wadley loop, but they aren't the same thing, and you get the "synthesizer" out of the signal path in the receiver. The circuitry would be about the same, if not a tad simpler, for the PLL. SO in the end, I'm not convinced of the Wadley loop being anything more than a neat trick, which at first seemed like a great solution in the fifties but in retrospect may not have been. Come the seventies with the FRG-7, there ultimately was no good reason to use the Wadley loop in there, and using a PLL might have given it better specs. Michael VE2BVW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Yaesu FRG-7700 General Coverage HF Receiver | Equipment | |||
FA: Racal RA6790 General Coverage HF Receiver - Simply the BEST! | Swap | |||
FA: beautiful Icom IC-R71A general coverage receiver | Swap | |||
FS: Heathkit SW-717 General Coverage Receiver | Boatanchors | |||
FS: Heathkit SW-717 General Coverage Receiver | Boatanchors |