On 26/08/13 18:47, Fred Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:59:07 +0000 (UTC), Stephen Thomas Cole
wrote:

I'm tempted to write to OFCOM and point out this loophole, truth be told.
This is a backdoor that needs to be locked shut, quick.

Quick Brian! Someone is trying to steal your blue flashing light! ROFL
- what a tool..

He'll have to close the HAREC loophole too.

I can imagine Ofcom's response to that, but he's probably already got a
more polite version from his backscratching supporters.

oops... that should be 'backchannel supporters'


--
Spike

On 27/08/13 09:47, Fred Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:04:01 +0100, Spike wrote:

He'll have to close the HAREC loophole too.

I can imagine Ofcom's response to that, but he's probably already got a
more polite version from his backscratching supporters.

He's drafting the first RFD in Ofcoms history as we speak ;-)

oops... that should be 'backchannel supporters'

I prefer "backend" or "arse end" myself..

Very approporiate!

I see RFD3 has hit the stands, and is generating much apathy.


--
Spike

On 27/08/13 09:50, Spike wrote:

I see RFD3 has hit the stands, and is generating much apathy.

This (in part) from Pedt in unnm;

"It a nutshell, you are making it 11 votes easier to litter the
hierarchy with little or never used groups and you are making it 6 votes
easier to forcibly delete a group in the face of opposition from the
users of the group. Neither has any benefit to the hierarchy. "

Agenda rumbled.

--
Spike