LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
Old March 22nd 05, 12:16 AM
Darrell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Actually, I think Drake was pretty clever. The tubes cost roughly half as
much as a 6146 and had about the same capabilities. Drake was smart enough
to run them within their ratings, unlike most other manufacturers that used
horizontal output tubes and tried to sqeeze every last watt out of them.
Add to that the fact that (according to tests results in the Bill Orr
Handbook) they actually had less distortion than the 6146 in linear
service, and it looks like a darn good decision.

I still remember a friend of mine running his TR4 full bore on 20 meters
RTTY back in the 1970's. He never had a problem.

73,
Darrell, WA5VGO


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA - R. L. Drake SW8 'portable' World Band Shortwave Communications Receiver RHF Shortwave 7 January 4th 05 03:00 AM
FS: Drake ML-2 Marker Luxury 2 Meter Transceiver (Tube Final) Dave Hollander Equipment 2 October 10th 03 10:13 PM
FS: Drake ML-2 Marker Luxury 2 Meter Transceiver (Tube Final) Dave Hollander Swap 1 October 10th 03 10:13 PM
FS: Drake ML-2 Marker Luxury 2 Meter Transceiver (Tube Final) Dave Hollander Boatanchors 0 October 10th 03 02:20 PM
FS: Drake ML-2 Marker Luxury 2 Meter Transceiver (Tube Final) Dave Hollander Equipment 0 October 10th 03 02:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017