Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Other weasel words I have seen on many company names these days. Are LLC instead of INC or CO .... I found it to be the acronym for Limited Liability Company. Anyone know what this means for them to weasel out of being liable? Seems like most companies are going to similar labels. I don't want to be liable for nothing either, but Sheezzzz!!! Do we all expect to get shafted from every place we do business now? Any enlightenment appreciated. Any lawyers out there? Can they really do business and not be responsible for the services and products they sell? Maybe not exactly on target for boatanchors, but applicable to all of us these days me thinks. "Bill Kirkland" wrote in message .. . Beg to differ. When I received an SP600 and cabinet from the US, FedEx had dropped it hard enough to break the mounting screws for the radio. It popped out of the cabinet and did the shake, rattle roll bit. They refused to pay. Initially saying inadequate packaging even though the person saying this had only seen the inspection report which was not accurately filled out. The story goes on and on. Finally I filed with small claims court and in about a week I got a call from their lawyer wanting to settle. When FedEx works, it works well. Pay attention to the "small print" which you have to go find somewhere in their website. They do NOT offer insurance on Ground. They do offer the opportunity to increase their liability coverage for a fee, i.e. how much you can hold them accountable for. This is the "extra" you are paying for and is required by US law. Otherwise they are limited to $100 liability. Note that when you do find the relevant document (which doesn't show up at all when you fill out the online paper work), they exclude "antiques". Never, ever tell them you shipped a vintage radio. bk Agreed. Let me also say that, from my experience, UPS and FedEx Ground break things at about the same rate. But when FedEx damages something, they promptly inspect it and pay out without a fuss, while UPS will do almost anything to avoid paying insurance claims. Admittedly I have had only three UPS issues, but all were nightmares. --scott |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr Fed UP wrote:
Other weasel words I have seen on many company names these days. Are LLC instead of INC or CO .... I found it to be the acronym for Limited Liability Company. Anyone know what this means for them to weasel out of being liable? Seems like most companies are going to similar labels. I don't want to be liable for nothing either, but Sheezzzz!!! Do we all expect to get shafted from every place we do business now? Any enlightenment appreciated. Any lawyers out there? Can they really do business and not be responsible for the services and products they sell? You're confusing liability for damages with liability between partners of a corporation. Same word, different context. Here's a brief explanation taken from the web. Liability Issues of a Limited Liability Company In a limited liability company, a member's legal liability is limited to his or her investment in the business. Generally, a member's personal assets are not at risk, but a member's personal assets may be at risk if any of the following occurs: * A member personally guarantees a business debt. * The form of business is found to be a sham (not properly formed or maintained). * A member becomes personally liable as a result of his or her own acts or conduct. -Bill |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok. I see now. But still not a comforting thing to see hang on a
company title. At least for me. Looks like they are making a hedge on legal proceedings before they even do business. LOL Maybe goes along with never reaching a real person on the phone. :-) Thanks for raking some of the muck off the new business jargon. I can feel a little less exposed now. "Bill" wrote in message ... Mr Fed UP wrote: Other weasel words I have seen on many company names these days. Are LLC instead of INC or CO .... I found it to be the acronym for Limited Liability Company. Anyone know what this means for them to weasel out of being liable? Seems like most companies are going to similar labels. I don't want to be liable for nothing either, but Sheezzzz!!! Do we all expect to get shafted from every place we do business now? Any enlightenment appreciated. Any lawyers out there? Can they really do business and not be responsible for the services and products they sell? You're confusing liability for damages with liability between partners of a corporation. Same word, different context. Here's a brief explanation taken from the web. Liability Issues of a Limited Liability Company In a limited liability company, a member's legal liability is limited to his or her investment in the business. Generally, a member's personal assets are not at risk, but a member's personal assets may be at risk if any of the following occurs: * A member personally guarantees a business debt. * The form of business is found to be a sham (not properly formed or maintained). * A member becomes personally liable as a result of his or her own acts or conduct. -Bill |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr Fed UP wrote:
Thanks for raking some of the muck off the new business jargon. I can feel a little less exposed now. Well, I suspect your instincts may be somewhat correct regardless. Many LLCs exist because the owners want to protect themselves against each other. -Bill |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bill wrote: Mr Fed UP wrote: Other weasel words I have seen on many company names these days. Are LLC instead of INC or CO .... I found it to be the acronym for Limited Liability Company. Anyone know what this means for them to weasel out of being liable? Seems like most companies are going to similar labels. I don't want to be liable for nothing either, but Sheezzzz!!! Do we all expect to get shafted from every place we do business now? Any enlightenment appreciated. Any lawyers out there? Can they really do business and not be responsible for the services and products they sell? You're confusing liability for damages with liability between partners of a corporation. Same word, different context. Here's a brief explanation taken from the web. Liability Issues of a Limited Liability Company In a limited liability company, a member's legal liability is limited to his or her investment in the business. Generally, a member's personal assets are not at risk, but a member's personal assets may be at risk if any of the following occurs: * A member personally guarantees a business debt. * The form of business is found to be a sham (not properly formed or maintained). * A member becomes personally liable as a result of his or her own acts or conduct. Technically, an "LLC" is a modified form of a partnership. In a traditional partnership, *each* owner is responsible for _all_ the liabilities of the business. In an LLC, 'n-1' (at *most*) of the partners are 'limited liability' partners -- they have liability exposure only up to the assets they have invested in the company (subject to 'special case' situations like those mentioned above, whereby they may incur additional liabilities). The remaining partner (or partners) is a "general partner", and is personally liable for any/all things above and beyond the assets provided by the "limited" partners. A full fledged "Corporation" is a 'legal person' in and of itself. Assets of the shareholders (the owners of the corporation) are immune from claims against the corporation. Officers and directors of the corporation may have personal liability to the shareholders for acts as a corporation official. Persons acting "on behalf of" the corporation may end up with personal liability for their own actions or conduct, IN ADDITION TO the corporation's liabilities for those actions/conduct. An LLC is much simpler -- in terms of organizational structure -- than a full- fledged corporation, But it gives the 'limited' members "almost all" of the protections of a passive stockholder in a corporation. Basically, it is an attempt to give the 'small guy' most of the benefits of the real corporation, without burdening him with all the overhead that is necessary for a large business entity -- WHILE, at the same time, ensuring that there _is_ a "responsible party" to fall back on, in the event of claims against the business. From a customer standpoint, there is essentially "no difference" between dealing with an LLC, and dealing with a full-blown corporation. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Cold Water Pipe Ground? | Antenna | |||
Grounding Rod | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
FS/FT Commercial VHF/UHF & Test Gear - Long List | Swap |