Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even disregarding the subtleties (of which there are many), these two
factors alone make HD AM dramatically superior to analog AM stereo. If IBOC were running pure compressed digital audio, that would be true!! However, IBOC on AM is only 36 kbps, and only maintains accurate frequency response up to _5 kHz_ -- all audio above that point is "spectrally replicated", i.e. "faked" based on harmonics of lower frequencies. To my ears, it sounds like the treble has been run through a cheese grater! Analog AM may have a more limited high frequency response, but at least it is ACCURATE treble response -- not screechy, gritty, heavily artifacted treble that is about as pleasing to the ears as fingernails scratching on a chalkboard. A new comparison between analog AM Stereo and digital IBOC/"HD Radio" AM can be found on this site: http://www.geocities.com/kevtronics Download the audio samples of both, and compare! p.s. One thing I can say, however, is that your Optimod 9100-B2 is the best-sounding analog AM audio processor that has ever been built -- and, of course, it really shines with AM Stereo. Stations which just want to be LOUD use the 9200... but stations which want to be both loud AND good-sounding almost universally use the 9100. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | Dx | |||
high quality graph of nice 0-100 analog scale? | Homebrew | |||
stuff for all hams | General |