pamthis (Sid Schweiger) wrote in message ...
I hardly think that a talk show host who continuously lies about facts- would
qualify as an entertainer. A broadcast "fraud" would better apply.

Your opinion.

I wasn't using the host as a reference. Since the airwaves are being used, I
have a right to expect they are being used fairly.

I love it when people invoke "rights," having no idea whatsoever whether those
rights actually exist. It must be some new thing, where just by claiming
"rights" they are magically manufactured out of thin air.

He was lying about a chemical analysis of the product which, if believed
without obtaining the safety data sheet- (and I have no doubt that his analysis
was believed by many listeners)- has no doubt caused some people to become sick
at the very least.

If there's "no doubt," then prove it. Right here. Post your proof for the
world to see.


The proof was sent to the FCC. They have done nothing about it.
First proove to us that you are an expert at analizing chemical data.
Second- you appear to be disputing the FACT that styrofoam is not
bio-degradeable. This leads me to believe that you are unqualified to
accept chemical facts when they stare you in the face. You also appear
to be disputing the FACT that many dioxins are poisonous. If you want
the facts- it appears to me that the first order of business would be
for you to hear the TAPES which document the lies. Get a group
together of 100 or more people-(hopefully a few with chemical and
toxicological expertise)- interested in hearing the tapes and it will
be worth my time toplay them for you- free of charge.

First proove to us that you are an expert at analizing chemical data.

Wrong. It's YOU making assertions that someone is lying. It's up to YOU to
prove it. It's not up to me to prove anything.

Second- you appear to be disputing the FACT that styrofoam is not
bio-degradeable. This leads me to believe that you are unqualified to accept
chemical facts when they stare you in the face.

Wrong again. Show me where I disputed your so-called "fact" (which you have
yet to prove).

You also appear to be disputing the FACT that many dioxins are poisonous.

Yet another assertion without proof.

If you want the facts- it appears to me that the first order of business would
be for you to hear the TAPES which document the lies.

Wrong yet again. Tapes, by themselves, document only what someone said. They
don't document lies OR facts. YOU say they're lies...so YOU have to prove it.

Get a group together of 100 or more people-(hopefully a few with chemical and
toxicological expertise)- interested in hearing the tapes and it will be worth
my time toplay them for you- free of charge.

Gee, that's a nice little evasion you've got going there. You'll only play the
tapes for 100 people.

BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT! Sorry, but thanks for playing. Trolls are ineligible to
win, but tell him about his consolation prizes, Don Pardo...

"misterfact" wrote in message
...
pamthis (Sid Schweiger) wrote in message
...
I hardly think that a talk show host who continuously lies about facts-
would
qualify as an entertainer. A broadcast "fraud" would better apply.

Your opinion.

I wasn't using the host as a reference. Since the airwaves are being
used, I
have a right to expect they are being used fairly.

I love it when people invoke "rights," having no idea whatsoever whether
those
rights actually exist. It must be some new thing, where just by claiming
"rights" they are magically manufactured out of thin air.

He was lying about a chemical analysis of the product which, if believed
without obtaining the safety data sheet- (and I have no doubt that his
analysis
was believed by many listeners)- has no doubt caused some people to
become sick
at the very least.

If there's "no doubt," then prove it. Right here. Post your proof for
the
world to see.


The proof was sent to the FCC. They have done nothing about it.

Since they have no jurisdiction, that seems logical.

First proove to us that you are an expert at analizing chemical data.

I'll bet even "experts" differ on issues.

Second- you appear to be disputing the FACT that styrofoam is not
bio-degradeable. This leads me to believe that you are unqualified to
accept chemical facts when they stare you in the face.

What is this? A styrofoam fetish?

You also appear
to be disputing the FACT that many dioxins are poisonous. If you want
the facts- it appears to me that the first order of business would be
for you to hear the TAPES which document the lies. Get a group
together of 100 or more people-(hopefully a few with chemical and
toxicological expertise)- interested in hearing the tapes and it will
be worth my time toplay them for you- free of charge.

Stop barking. There are no raccoons in this particular tree.