Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone know where I can obtain a plot of the antenna pattern for
a major (50,000 watt) commercial broadcast station? Ted- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ted Jensen" wrote in message ... Does anyone know where I can obtain a plot of the antenna pattern for a major (50,000 watt) commercial broadcast station? www.radiolocator.com (where you'll find it, and any other AM station in the US and Canada) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- If there's nothing that offends you in your community, then you know you're not living in a free society. Kim Campbell - ex-Prime Minister of Canada - 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For direct replies, take out the contents between the hyphens. -Really!- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone know where I can obtain a plot of the antenna pattern for
a major (50,000 watt) commercial broadcast station? www.radiolocator.com (where you'll find it, and any other AM station in the US and Canada) ____________________ The contours shown on Radiolocator.com are based BOTH on the radiation pattern of the transmit antenna system, and ground conductivity along various radials for 360° around the transmit site. If conductivity was a constant throughout the groundwave coverage area of the station (almost never happens), then from the "patterns" on Radiolocator - to the extent they are accurate - you could calculate the actual shape of the transmit antenna radiation pattern, remembering that field strength changes as the square root of changes in radiated power. RF Visit http://rfry.org for FM broadcast RF system papers. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
www.radiolocator.com
Come on, Bob. You should know better than that. Radio-locator.com's maps are clearly labeled "This image is intended solely for entertainment purposes," and quite frankly belong in the funny papers, since they bear no resemblance whatsoever to either the FCC-approved directional pattern or any sort of real-world coverage (even though the program's coder claims they're drawn using FCC data). R.J. Carpenter's AMSTNS and TVFMSTNS programs are the real McCoy, since they plot the patterns directly from the FCC data, and they're the only programs I know of with such information that are updated periodically. Even though they're DOS programs, they run just fine on the versions of Windows that only have DOS emulators (i.e., NT, 2000 and XP). |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sid Schweiger" wrote in message ... www.radiolocator.com Come on, Bob. You should know better than that. Radio-locator.com's maps are clearly labeled "This image is intended solely for entertainment purposes," and quite frankly belong in the funny papers, since they bear no resemblance whatsoever to either the FCC-approved directional pattern or any sort of real-world coverage (even though the program's coder claims they're drawn using FCC data). R.J. Carpenter's AMSTNS and TVFMSTNS programs are the real McCoy, since they plot the patterns directly from the FCC data, and they're the only programs I know of with such information that are updated periodically. Even though they're DOS programs, they run just fine on the versions of Windows that only have DOS emulators (i.e., NT, 2000 and XP). Oh, my! I just made the connection. I've got a copy of Bob's software, discovered quite by accident somewhere, and it's given me hours of fascination. The only reason I suggested radio-locator is because it integrates the pattern with a map, and I honestly didn't think the inquirer had much need for anything more than a representation. But, come on, back at'cha...you know the reason why the disclaimer "for entertainment purposes only" is there is because there's no desire on the part of the website to become embroiled in some twit's lawsuit when it's used as a source for a frequency search. At the same time, I don't think that the radiation pattern or inverse-km is what's being sought, here, but an estimate of what this station's reasonable coverage area is. In that regard, 2 mV/m or 4 mV/m doesn't really make a whole lot of difference....especially with the crud that's all over the AM band these days. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- If there's nothing that offends you in your community, then you know you're not living in a free society. Kim Campbell - ex-Prime Minister of Canada - 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For direct replies, take out the contents between the hyphens. -Really!- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you for the nice comments about AMSTNS (and TVFMSTNS).
What makes these most useful is that Larry Vehorn, W9AJ, keeps the data up to date. You should be thanking Larry for all his effort. He's doubtless very busy as the transmitter guru for over a dozen transmitters ranging from Class A FM through UHF TV to 500 kW shortwave beasts. And they are spread from one end of the USA to the other. 73 de bob w3otc |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ted Jensen wrote:
Does anyone know where I can obtain a plot of the antenna pattern for a major (50,000 watt) commercial broadcast station? Go to your local station and ask to look in the public inspection file. There should be one there. If you ask the engineer nicely (and they are a station that still has an engineer), he might also have some old proofs so you can see how widely the pattern varies from year to year. Be aware that the plot for a 50KW station on a stick in Montana will be radically different than the plot for the same transmitter and tower in Arizona. Which is what makes it fun. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ted Jensen" wrote in message ... Does anyone know where I can obtain a plot of the antenna pattern for a major (50,000 watt) commercial broadcast station? Do you want antenna pattern or station's coverage? Pattern is easy. There are a number of on-line sources including the FCC's AMQUERY. You can also download the whole AM database and display patterns in my AMSTNS program available (with very recent data) from http://home.earthlink.net/~lvehorn/ Coverage is hard, since interference from other stations is involved - a simple field strength prediction is not adequate. The only RELIABLE source I know for interference-free coverage is to look up the station's actual application on the FCC's AMQUERY. 73 de bob w3otc |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ted Jensen" wrote in message ... : Does anyone know where I can obtain a plot of the antenna pattern for : a major (50,000 watt) commercial broadcast station? : : Ted- : Check here. http://www.radio-locator.com/ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Does anyone know where I can obtain a plot of the antenna pattern for a major (50,000 watt) commercial broadcast station? Which one. There are several hundred which are 50 kW. Perhaps the most interesting Class A pattern is WSAI's. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
New antenna technology??? | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
License for 2-way radio supporting both GMRS/FRS??? | Policy |