Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Sep 2006 02:53:13 -0700, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote: +++ +++Frank Gilliland wrote: +++ No PCB = no cracked traces, copper seperation, no burnt boards, better +++ heat dissipation, more efficient conductors, etc, etc. Let's face it: +++ replace the power transistors more than twice on a PCB and your board +++ (and therfore your amp) is garbage. Not only that, but it also allows +++ the flexibility to use transistors of different physical sizes and +++ styles; i.e, the amp can be upgraded or retrofit as desired. +++ +++You're losin' it... no PCB at RF frequencies means wires and +++uncontrolled inductances / resonances all over the place causing +++instabilities... resulting in oscillations. Why don't you think any +++commercial amps are built your way. +++Great idea Frank... LOL... you're truly a great engineer! +++ +++www.telstar-electronics.com *************** Below about 1 KW, PCBs are adequate. In the 10 to 20KW range forget laminates. You would have to plate at least 3 ounce if not 4 ounce copper. Beisdes most laminates will have tremendous problems with RF currents at these power levels. AIr dielectric or even ceramics provide a better solution. Also I believe Frank never mentioned the actual power out of his design. james |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|