| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 23 Dec 2006 05:46:50 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in om: Frank Gilliland wrote: I've had it in my files since the chip first came out. Studied it several times. Even used the chip in a couple designs. It faithfully reproduces an audio sinewave... but has an AGC. Any linear amplifier will "reproduce" a sinewave. If it has AGC then how "faithfully" that sinewave is reproduced depends on the time constant of the AGC loop. The harmonic dostortion is less than 1% according to the spec. That's for a 1kHz sinewave with 1:1 (no) compression. That's pretty crappy even for a CB, and proves that -you- didn't read the complete datasheet. For comparison, look at the specs of the CA3080. So far, my new design is working well... and has constant audio punch level... no matter if you whisper or yell into the mic Exactly what is needed! If that's the case then you set the feedback time constant too slow and built yourself a CVA, not a compressor. Look at the scope and you will see spikes. With the fast attack/release of the noise gate feature.. this chip is fantastic at blocking ambient background noise! Yes, it works very well at blocking signals. So does a switch. The problems start when it begins -passing- signals. Didn't I tell you to do your research? Well... it seems you are much smarter than the engineers at Analog Devices... LOL Maybe. Maybe not. But I'm definitely smarter than you. I understand how the chip works and its intended purpose, which is not the same as the objective of your hacked design -- to increase the talk-power of a CB radio. They could sure use someone like you. Why don't you send them your resume? Why don't you spend some time and effort to learn about this stuff so you can build something good instead of hacking other people's designs and hoping they sell? |