Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25 Dec 2006 08:07:13 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in . com: Frank Gilliland wrote: Why don't you spend some time and effort to learn about this stuff so you can build something good instead of hacking other people's designs and hoping they sell? Frank, never hacked at anyones design. My designs are all original... Right. Let's start with your earlier design, a 2-pill, push-pull "linear" hacked from a Communications Concepts kit, which itself is a hack from a Motorola datasheet; then when under pressure for a decent bias circuit you hack a design from a ham's webpage on and refuse to disclose the schematic. You start -this- thread by openly admitting how you are hacking a "compressor" circuit from another ham. Yet you maintain that none of your designs are hacked. I'm now convinced that you have redefined the term "hacked" to suit your purposes, just like you did with the word "linear", and will likely do with "compression". Congratulations, you just graduated from the Presidential Academy of Semantics. your designs are nonexistant... LOL And once again you're back to the "sour grapes" excuse..... you should have stopped with the 'lying president' emulation. |