Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My opinion would not be much better than the local weatherman's forecast -
and that is less than 50% ![]() unlikely much less. Again, just a guess. It is too bad some folks are so anti-no code. Good safety (rf, ac, and proper grounding) along with reasonable practical exams (where you can operate and power/mode limitations) should be sufficient for the general ticket (in my opinion; others may well disagree). The extra is probably about right as it currently is; more questions, perhaps, on different modes. Modulation techniques, whatever - but I'm straying from the question (which is to say I haven't the foggiest - I'm guessing two years would be a minimum unless the ARRL were to petition the FCC and, although they are a good organization, they also are realistic politicians; meaning they don't want to rock the boat too much too quickly ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote: Scott, Do I detect a hint of jealousy amongst the denizens of the group that you got the answer 100% right? BWAAaaahahahaha! LMAO 73 from Rochester, NY Jim Hey Jim, how long before no CW's required here? (in your opinion) -- GO# 40 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 7/24/03 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Homebrew | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Homebrew | |||
QEI INC. QUINDAR RADIO UNIT TELEMETRY QUESTION got from hamfest | General | |||
BPL Video On-Line | Policy |