| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
October 22nd 03, 01:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
On 21 Oct 2003 22:27:50 GMT, Steveo
wrote: lancer wrote: On 21 Oct 2003 12:24:22 -0700, (Citizens For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup) wrote: wrote: snip Oh I see those shiny loading coils must really increase the gain of the antenna huh. I never explained why one antenna outperforms another. I just posted the numbers. You can draw your own explanation. Oh sure I supose the 31" S- METER really proves the accuracy of the test better than using Smith charts LOL. How do you calculate antenna gain with a smith chart? From personal experience, the longer antenna -seems- to work better. Maybe it's the more broadbanded part, maybe it's the power handling capability without frying a load coil, or both. What sucks is the tree pruning, with the long one. To answer the OP, forget the twin talkers, they're too close to each other. As a rule they do, I think Tnom was just trying to point out that the construction is also important. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| stuff for all hams | General | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| Amateur Radio "outside the box" | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
