From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , wrote:
Many times...........even tested them.

Sorry your tests results were debunked by

Frank in the xterminator thread, you are a

voodoo tech


(Frank never tested any of the antennas.)


I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the

roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied it back so the

top was parallel with the ground (pointing

East, if that makes a difference).

Measurements were compared to the antenna
straight up.......;

SWR didn't change at all, and vertically

polarized field strength dropped by a hair.

However, horizontally polarized field strength

made a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I

listened to the toilet bowl while pulling on the

lanyard.




But,,,,there is supposed to be no skip...


Some weak signals disappeared while others

came in that weren't there before. Let the whip
go back to vertical and the old signals came

back while the new signals were lost.

Looks like it's a compromise situation.
=A0



It is. You failed to account for, or at least detail, a myriad of
factors. Were you in a free zone? How near was the closest object? Did
you have a duplicate antenna in which to compare duplicate tests? Did
you repeat the test with the antenna on the opposite side of the
vehicle? Did you move the vehicle around? A single day's atmospheric
condition for a single test? One perfunctory test is meaningless in the
context of science.




(=A0Frank as well as you still
believes the earth is flat.)




-----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----=3D=3D Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =3D-----

In ,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
In , wrote:
Many times...........even tested them.

Sorry your tests results were debunked by

Frank in the xterminator thread, you are a

voodoo tech


(Frank never tested any of the antennas.)


I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the

roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied it back so the

top was parallel with the ground (pointing

East, if that makes a difference).

Measurements were compared to the antenna
straight up.......;

SWR didn't change at all, and vertically

polarized field strength dropped by a hair.

However, horizontally polarized field strength

made a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I

listened to the toilet bowl while pulling on the

lanyard.




But,,,,there is supposed to be no skip...


Who said anything about skip, Twist?


Some weak signals disappeared while others

came in that weren't there before. Let the whip
go back to vertical and the old signals came

back while the new signals were lost.

Looks like it's a compromise situation.
*



It is. You failed to account for, or at least detail, a myriad of
factors. Were you in a free zone?


No, I pay taxes just like every other homeowner.


How near was the closest object?


The curb was right next to the truck. Gee, maybe that messed up my
test.....


Did
you have a duplicate antenna in which to compare duplicate tests?


Yes I did. Did I use it? No.


Did
you repeat the test with the antenna on the opposite side of the
vehicle?


The antenna not mounted on either side of the vehicle. It was mounted
on the front of the vehicle, which I clearly stated and you couldn't
comprehend because of your communication deficit.


Did you move the vehicle around?


Why yes, it started break-dancing as soon as I keyed the mic.


A single day's atmospheric
condition for a single test?


Sunny, 74 degrees, 20% humidity, 29.96 in/Hg, tree and grass pollen
were moderate, weed pollen was low, mold spores were high, no
measurable seismic activity and the aurora monitor was quiet.


One perfunctory test is meaningless in the
context of science.


Unless the test is conclusive. Once again you are confusing inductive
and deductive logic, but that's no suprise since the only part of the
book you studied was the chapter on logical fallacies.




=============

http://tinyurl.com/ytcah
http://tinyurl.com/2yor7
http://tinyurl.com/2sapq
(Twisty cast the first stone)

=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."

"...but as usual, your best simpl isn;t good enough."

"Athis is how proper communication wroks..."

---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

From: (iamnotiamnotgeorge2004)
In ,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote:
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , wrote:
Many times...........even tested them.

Sorry your tests results were debunked by

Frank in the xterminator thread, you are a

voodoo tech

(Frank never tested any of the antennas.)

I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the

roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied it back so the

top was parallel with the ground (pointing

East, if that makes a difference).

Measurements were compared to the antenna
straight up.......;

SWR didn't change at all, and vertically

polarized field strength dropped by a hair.

owever, horizontally polarized field strength

made a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I

listened to the toilet bowl while pulling on the

lanyard.

But,,,,there is supposed to be no skip...


Who said anything about skip, Twist?



Go to the local flea market and buy a cheap webtv, Frank. You're
cornfused again and are calling everyone "twist".
What is "the toilet bowl"? I was assuming you referred to 6 since you
have a perpetual menstruation concerning skip and big radios.
Since you were listening to 6, you were hearing skip, as you damn sure
weren't listening local.


Some weak signals disappeared while others

came in that weren't there before.



And those "weak" signals must have been local, since you are playing
semantic word games and essentially claiming there was no skip.

Let the whip

go back to vertical and the old signals came

back while the new signals were lost.

Looks like it's a compromise situation.
=A0
It is. You failed to account for, or at least detail, a myriad of
factors. Were you in a free zone?

No, I pay taxes just like every other

homeowner.


All you had to say was you were wrong, you don;t have to cry about it.
After all, one wouldn't expect any experiment performed by yourself
yield anything other than subjective results.
_
How near was the closest object?

The curb was right next to the truck. Gee,

maybe that messed up my test.....


Your incompetence did that.

_
Did
you have a duplicate antenna in which to compare duplicate tests?

Yes I did. Did I use it? No.


Flawing your subjected reportings even further.


Did
you repeat the test with the antenna on the opposite side of the
vehicle?

The antenna not mounted on either side of the
vehicle. It was mounted on the front of the

vehicle, which I clearly stated and you couldn't
comprehend because of your communication

deficit.




To be fair, you need spoon fed and asked may things twice, because you
have problems making yourself clear and once you say something, you
often must reclarify yourself because you maintain what you wrote wasn't
esxactly what you meant. Add to this your repeated homage via liberal
quoting of myself, and there we have it.


Did you move the vehicle around?

Why yes, it started break-dancing as soon as I
keyed the mic.
=A0=A0
LOL,,,,,no need for the sarcasm,,,,I understand your reluctance to
discuss your limitations.
None really needed me to point out your flawed test, as most caught it
as soon as you posted your incompetence.



A single day's atmospheric
condition for a single test?

Sunny, 74 degrees, 20% humidity, 29.96

in/Hg, tree and grass pollen were moderate,

weed pollen was low, mold spores were high,

no measurable seismic activity and the aurora

monitor was quiet.



Now duplicate your tests in addition to your climate.



=A0=A0One perfunctory test is meaningless in the context of science.

Unless the test is conclusive.


One test can never be be conclusive in such applied logistics.


Once again you are confusing inductive and

deductive logic,



Not at all, you''re confusing my objective logic with your subjective
results.


but that's no suprise since the only part of the

book you studied was the chapter on logical

fallacies.



Toss all the one liner insults you need in order to soothe your low
self-esteem. If I wouldn't have pointed out your incompetence
concerning your monkey acts, ignorance, and inability to differentiate
between objective and subjective results, another most certainly would
have.

wrote in message . ..
In ,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
In , wrote:
Many times...........even tested them.

Sorry your tests results were debunked by

Frank in the xterminator thread, you are a

voodoo tech


(Frank never tested any of the antennas.)


I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the

roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied it back so the

top was parallel with the ground (pointing

East, if that makes a difference).

Measurements were compared to the antenna
straight up.......;

SWR didn't change at all, and vertically

polarized field strength dropped by a hair.

However, horizontally polarized field strength

made a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I

listened to the toilet bowl while pulling on the

lanyard.




But,,,,there is supposed to be no skip...


Who said anything about skip, Twist?


Some weak signals disappeared while others

came in that weren't there before. Let the whip
go back to vertical and the old signals came

back while the new signals were lost.

Looks like it's a compromise situation.
*



It is. You failed to account for, or at least detail, a myriad of
factors. Were you in a free zone?


No, I pay taxes just like every other homeowner.


How near was the closest object?


The curb was right next to the truck. Gee, maybe that messed up my
test.....


Did
you have a duplicate antenna in which to compare duplicate tests?


Yes I did. Did I use it? No.


Did
you repeat the test with the antenna on the opposite side of the
vehicle?


The antenna not mounted on either side of the vehicle. It was mounted
on the front of the vehicle, which I clearly stated and you couldn't
comprehend because of your communication deficit.


Did you move the vehicle around?


Why yes, it started break-dancing as soon as I keyed the mic.


A single day's atmospheric
condition for a single test?


Sunny, 74 degrees, 20% humidity, 29.96 in/Hg, tree and grass pollen
were moderate, weed pollen was low, mold spores were high, no
measurable seismic activity and the aurora monitor was quiet.


One perfunctory test is meaningless in the
context of science.


Unless the test is conclusive. Once again you are confusing inductive
and deductive logic, but that's no suprise since the only part of the
book you studied was the chapter on logical fallacies.




=============

http://tinyurl.com/ytcah
http://tinyurl.com/2yor7
http://tinyurl.com/2sapq
(Twisty cast the first stone)

=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."

"...but as usual, your best simpl isn;t good enough."

"Athis is how proper communication wroks..."

---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


frank........twistie is a big skip talker ...didn't you know that???
he talks on channel 6......he is a big strapper........

In ,
(gw) wrote:

snip

frank........twistie is a big skip talker ...didn't you know that???
he talks on channel 6......he is a big strapper........


That's the only way he can feel important -- imagining himself as a
'big man on the bowl'.





-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

lol here is the barney bend


http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/D...ayberryPD2.jpg

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/D...-Delmont88.jpg

"Frank Gilliland" in message-id:
wrote:


"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge"
wrote
in message ...
(I Am Not George) wrote in
m:

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/D...-Delmont88.jpg



heheheh hehehe uhh that's cool.

So is this little bro.

http://www.bway.net/nambla.org/



definitely a forgery of Frank by someone who believes he is me

(I Am Not George) wrote in message om...
"Frank Gilliland" in message-id:
wrote:


"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge"
wrote
in message ...
(I Am Not George) wrote in
m:

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/D...-Delmont88.jpg



heheheh hehehe uhh that's cool.

So is this little bro.

http://www.bway.net/nambla.org/



definitely a forgery of Frank by someone who believes he is me


probably twistinutts dave .....

"gw" wrote in message
om...
(I Am Not George) wrote in message
om...
"Frank Gilliland" in message-id:
wrote:


"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge"
wrote
in message ...
(I Am Not George) wrote in
m:

http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/D...-Delmont88.jpg



heheheh hehehe uhh that's cool.

So is this little bro.

http://www.bway.net/nambla.org/



definitely a forgery of Frank by someone who believes he is me


probably twistinutts dave .....

GW, first, learn to use caps, second, crawl back under the central Texas
limestone from whence you post.