| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
January 11th 05, 12:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:29:28 GMT, Lancer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:40:30 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Dave*Hall) On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:37:50 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: N3CVJ said The "DX" has nothing to do with the amount of splatter and the distortion a signal may have. It has everything to with it. For the amount of times you professed to having talked skip on the freeband, followed by recent denials of you talking skip, you should know that on MANY occasion, a signal can be severely wavering from an S1 to an S9 (for but one of many examples),,,when that signal is coming in at an S9, the splatter may be intense if you changed the channel and went one up or down. When that signal is coming in on a wavering S1, you will hear absolutely nothing on your next channel. Once again, the wavering is a direct result of...taa daaa....skip. You may not hear anything on the next channel because the signal may not be strong enough or because of "selective fading" . Splatter is caused by the modulation, it may or may not be intensified by skip. But it is not caused by "skip" If you had a constant carrier(no modulation), skip or not, you wouldn't have splatter. He probably thinks that FM won't skip either...... Dave "Sandbagger" |
|
#3
January 11th 05, 01:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:56:21 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:29:28 GMT, Lancer wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:40:30 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (DaveĀ*Hall) On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:37:50 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: N3CVJ said The "DX" has nothing to do with the amount of splatter and the distortion a signal may have. It has everything to with it. For the amount of times you professed to having talked skip on the freeband, followed by recent denials of you talking skip, you should know that on MANY occasion, a signal can be severely wavering from an S1 to an S9 (for but one of many examples),,,when that signal is coming in at an S9, the splatter may be intense if you changed the channel and went one up or down. When that signal is coming in on a wavering S1, you will hear absolutely nothing on your next channel. Once again, the wavering is a direct result of...taa daaa....skip. You may not hear anything on the next channel because the signal may not be strong enough or because of "selective fading" . Splatter is caused by the modulation, it may or may not be intensified by skip. But it is not caused by "skip" If you had a constant carrier(no modulation), skip or not, you wouldn't have splatter. He probably thinks that FM won't skip either...... Dave "Sandbagger" Who? |
|
#4
January 11th 05, 02:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lancer" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:56:21 -0500, Dave Hall wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:29:28 GMT, Lancer wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:40:30 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (DaveĀ Hall) On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:37:50 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: N3CVJ said The "DX" has nothing to do with the amount of splatter and the distortion a signal may have. It has everything to with it. For the amount of times you professed to having talked skip on the freeband, followed by recent denials of you talking skip, you should know that on MANY occasion, a signal can be severely wavering from an S1 to an S9 (for but one of many examples),,,when that signal is coming in at an S9, the splatter may be intense if you changed the channel and went one up or down. When that signal is coming in on a wavering S1, you will hear absolutely nothing on your next channel. Once again, the wavering is a direct result of...taa daaa....skip. You may not hear anything on the next channel because the signal may not be strong enough or because of "selective fading" . Splatter is caused by the modulation, it may or may not be intensified by skip. But it is not caused by "skip" If you had a constant carrier(no modulation), skip or not, you wouldn't have splatter. He probably thinks that FM won't skip either...... Dave "Sandbagger" Who? I'm sure he's trying to imply Frank or I, no bigge. Landshark -- Is it so frightening to have me at your shoulder? Thunder and lightning couldn't be bolder. I'll write on your tombstone, ``I thank you for dinner.'' This game that we animals play is a winner. |
|
#5
January 12th 05, 11:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:15:34 GMT, Lancer wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:56:21 -0500, Dave Hall wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:29:28 GMT, Lancer wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:40:30 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Dave*Hall) On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:37:50 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: N3CVJ said The "DX" has nothing to do with the amount of splatter and the distortion a signal may have. It has everything to with it. For the amount of times you professed to having talked skip on the freeband, followed by recent denials of you talking skip, you should know that on MANY occasion, a signal can be severely wavering from an S1 to an S9 (for but one of many examples),,,when that signal is coming in at an S9, the splatter may be intense if you changed the channel and went one up or down. When that signal is coming in on a wavering S1, you will hear absolutely nothing on your next channel. Once again, the wavering is a direct result of...taa daaa....skip. You may not hear anything on the next channel because the signal may not be strong enough or because of "selective fading" . Splatter is caused by the modulation, it may or may not be intensified by skip. But it is not caused by "skip" If you had a constant carrier(no modulation), skip or not, you wouldn't have splatter. He probably thinks that FM won't skip either...... Dave "Sandbagger" Who? The person who thinks skip causes an otherwise clean signal to splatter. Dave "Sandbagger" |
|
#6
January 12th 05, 02:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
N3CVJ:
The person who thinks skip causes an otherwise clean signal to splatter. Dave "Sandbagger" You are the *only* person to mention such a monster. |
|
#7
January 11th 05, 02:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:29:28 GMT, Lancer wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:40:30 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Dave Hall) On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:37:50 -0500, (Twistedhed) wrote: N3CVJ said The "DX" has nothing to do with the amount of splatter and the distortion a signal may have. It has everything to with it. For the amount of times you professed to having talked skip on the freeband, followed by recent denials of you talking skip, you should know that on MANY occasion, a signal can be severely wavering from an S1 to an S9 (for but one of many examples),,,when that signal is coming in at an S9, the splatter may be intense if you changed the channel and went one up or down. When that signal is coming in on a wavering S1, you will hear absolutely nothing on your next channel. Once again, the wavering is a direct result of...taa daaa....skip. You may not hear anything on the next channel because the signal may not be strong enough or because of "selective fading" . Splatter is caused by the modulation, it may or may not be intensified by skip. But it is not caused by "skip" If you had a constant carrier(no modulation), skip or not, you wouldn't have splatter. He probably thinks that FM won't skip either...... Dave "Sandbagger" On the contrary Dave, it does too. Landshark -- Is it so frightening to have me at your shoulder? Thunder and lightning couldn't be bolder. I'll write on your tombstone, ``I thank you for dinner.'' This game that we animals play is a winner. |
|
#8
January 11th 05, 01:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lancer wrote:
But it is not caused by "skip" If you had a constant carrier(no modulation), skip or not, you wouldn't have splatter. Same is said for the harmonics Davie is speaking of. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Improve handheld audio? | Homebrew | |||
| Improve handheld audio? | Digital | |||
| Improve handheld audio? | Digital | |||
| Improve handheld audio? | Homebrew | |||
| How to improve reception | Equipment | |||
Hybrid Mode
