So, you think that harassing a man, such as being done here, would NOT be
found to be offensive to the general public???
You think the general public would support your abuse of this man???

Well, maybe so, or maybe you should rethink that....

Regards,
John
"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
...
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:9844-4276C807-
:
From: (John Smith)
I am not positive here (and I am no
lawyer--but the man you stalk needs to take your posts and pics to one),
but you seem in violation of the stalking laws--
Cite the single passage you misinterpret him violating as pertains to
stalking laws.
I think if he now sues your A$$ he will have gobs of money to feed his
kids with!!!
Regards,
John
-
No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to
talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes
stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think
about such things.
-
You have no idea who made the invite,

The rest of your post assumes the above to be true. You have discounted
the possibility the identity of one who made such a physical threat was
found immediately after the post and logged with the isp's he utilized,
due to them being contacted and instructed future legal ramifications
may arise referring this specific user due his violation of the law.
But I'll play devil's advocate for you.


some one says they are george bush and to

come to the white house you have carte

blanche to go there?


Good point. I taught N3CVJ this a few posts ago when he said saying
something on usenet is the same as a guilty plea in a court of law.
Where were you then? : )

Dont be so ****ing stupid. just the same as I

AM NOW CHRIS BUSCH loL this assclown is

as clueless as you tipsy.. and thats bad


(shrug) Clueless is providing the FCC a false address. It's also a
crime.

From: (John=A0Smith)
So, you think that harassing a man, such as

being done here, would NOT be found to be

offensive to the general public???


I believe "harassment" is something that must be proved beyond a doubt
by a court of law, not an internet usenet opinion. In this specific
incident,Dogie not only initiated and began the harassment of many on
here, mopar included, he libeled many good folks here. Once the court
was made aware Dogie not only initiated such behavior, but continued a
campaign of personal electronic "harassment" for many years, they would
conclude he has no ground for suit. Of this, I am absolutely confident.

You think the general public would support

your abuse of this man???


Ummm,,,,what I 'think", is the hordes would come out of the woodwork to
give proper testimony (via a notarized statement) to the court
concerning Dogie's abuse along with proper examples. Mopar's statements
are quite benign compared to the psycho libelant Dogie's comments and
threats.

Well, maybe so, or maybe you should rethink

that....

Regards,

John

Dude,,,you ought check this libelant's entrance into the group. Google
N8WWM in this group, place his posts in chronological order and enjoy a
classic textbook piece of usenet history of one being driven underground
because of his own criminality, unprovoked attacks, incompetence, and
sickness. A real treat.

wrong, twitlips. Nobody is undergound here. It could be however, that
those jockstraps you wear on your head are blocking your vision. We
were told that they are heavily stained from you using them to act out
your fantasies, so it is likely that even the sheerest ones in your
collection would block eyesight.