| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
May 7th 05, 08:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote:
"chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC" wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590 @g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper? He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him why contribute more/. That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open invitation, why would that be considered stalking. You are one stupid ****. Jeff |
|
#2
May 7th 05, 09:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote:
"chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC" wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590 @g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper? He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him why contribute more/. That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open invitation, why would that be considered stalking. Stupid ass Mayner. Use your brain. Show me a post where Leland or Doug invited Mopey to "come over and take photos and then publish them on the internet along with court records, wifes name, boss name, place of employment phone number, etc." You can't. Therefore it's stalking, according to the definition in the Ohio statute. "Menacing by stalking" is a crime under Ohio law. Ohio Revised Code (R.C.) Section*2903.211. It is also grounds for seeking and obtaining a Civil Stalking Protection Order (CPO) or a Criminal Stalking Protection Order. Ohio’s menacing by stalking law provides: No person by engaging in a pattern of conduct shall knowingly cause another to believe that the offender will cause physical harm to the other person or cause mental distress to the other person. Any conduct that is in violation of this law constitutes "menacing by stalking." A "pattern of conduct" means two or more actions or incidents closely related in time, whether or not there has been a prior conviction based on any of those actions or incidents. This very broad definition of a "pattern of conduct" constituting menacing by stalking includes, for example, such conduct as: following or pursuing the victim; making harassing phone calls to the victim or sending the victim harassing letters; verbal threats of physical harm to the victim; driving around the victim’s house; harassing the victim at his/her school or place of employment; and any other type of conduct intended to threaten, frighten, or intimidate the victim. A victim may file a petition for a civil stalking protection order without filing criminal menacing by stalking charges against his/her stalker. Any violation of a stalking criminal or civil protection order is itself a crime punishable as*contempt of court or as a separate crime under Ohio Revised Code*(R.C.)*Section*2919.27. A motion for a criminal stalking civil protection order may only be filed when the victim also files criminal menacing by stalking charges against his/her stalker, but a petition for a stalking civil protection order may be filed at any time. A civil stalking protection order will remain in effect for a longer period of time and may provide greater protection than a criminal stalking protection order. Downloadable Files: * 10.03-A: A Motion for Criminal Stalking Protection Order * 10.03-B: Criminal Stalking Protection Order (SPO) * 10.03-D: Petition for Civil Stalking Protection Order (CSPO) * 10.03-E: Civil Stalking Protection Order (CSPO) EX PARTE * 10.03-F: Civil Stalking Protection Order (CSPO) Full Hearing * 10.03-G: Instructions For Obtaining Civil Stalking Protection Order (CSPO) * 10.03-H: Warning Concerning Attached Stalking Protection Order * FULL PACKAGE - All Stalking Court Forms and Instructions Privacy Policy * | * Copyright © 2001 Ohio State Legal Services Association. All rights reserved. |
|
#3
May 8th 05, 12:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
May 8th 05, 12:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#6
May 9th 05, 03:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: "chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC" wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590 @g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper? He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him why contribute more/. That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open invitation, why would that be considered stalking. Stupid ass Mayner. Use your brain. Evidently, you didn't. The op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation, period. Use _your_ brain. Jeff WTF??? Show me the Ohio Law that states if " the op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation" You wrote on Oct 16 2004: hey assflap, you can't prove those pics are real so go ahead keep avoiding the issue it only makes you look more like a liar LOL. Squirm, squirm, ,,,squirm, squirm squirming. aaaaaaaaaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Report to my office, nadia. Look up peoples info and threaten all you want, Mopathetic. It's all you can do, because you are truly powerless to do anything else. You certainly won't dare to show your face in person. LOL. |
|
#7
May 8th 05, 02:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 7 May 2005 16:04:36 -0700, "Jeff Mayner" wrote:
wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: "chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC" wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590 @g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper? He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him why contribute more/. That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open invitation, why would that be considered stalking. Stupid ass Mayner. Use your brain. Evidently, you didn't. The op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation, period. Use _your_ brain. He's an idiot. He calls him a stalker, and he threatened to do the same to me, only I didn't dare him to. He chose my of all the people here. Section 8 white trash at its finest. Vinnie S. |
|
#8
May 8th 05, 10:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Vinnie S. wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005 16:04:36 -0700, "Jeff Mayner" wrote: wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: "chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC" wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590 @g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper? He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him why contribute more/. That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open invitation, why would that be considered stalking. Stupid ass Mayner. Use your brain. Evidently, you didn't. The op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation, period. Use _your_ brain. He's an idiot. He calls him a stalker, and he threatened to do the same to me, only I didn't dare him to. He chose my of all the people here. Section 8 white trash at its finest. Vinnie S. He's just sore that I asked him about his neighbors.  |
|
#9
May 8th 05, 01:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 08 May 2005 09:15:37 GMT, Steveo wrote:
The op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation, period. Use _your_ brain. He's an idiot. He calls him a stalker, and he threatened to do the same to me, only I didn't dare him to. He chose my of all the people here. Section 8 white trash at its finest. Vinnie S. He's just sore that I asked him about his neighbors. Looks like the Imax is going up today. I went in the tree 25 feet, but was shaking because the damn thing wasn't perfectly straight. I cut all the limb to about 35 feet. I purchased a 30 foot telescoping mast from Lowe's, and will bolt it to the side of the tree. I will be about about 36 feet. Will report back tonight. Vinnie S. |
|
#10
May 8th 05, 02:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steveo wrote: Vinnie S. wrote: On Sat, 7 May 2005 16:04:36 -0700, "Jeff Mayner" wrote: wrote: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote: "chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC" wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590 @g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper? He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him why contribute more/. That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open invitation, why would that be considered stalking. Stupid ass Mayner. Use your brain. Evidently, you didn't. The op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation, period. Use _your_ brain. He's an idiot. He calls him a stalker, and he threatened to do the same to me, only I didn't dare him to. He chose my of all the people here. Section 8 white trash at its finest. Vinnie S. He's just sore that I asked him about his neighbors. Why wont mopathetic answer the AKC? He is a coward, that's why. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Why is mopathetic hiding from the AKC? | CB | |||
| Wrist flipper mopathetic dribbling more squirrel doo doo, as usual | CB | |||
| wrist flipper mopey LOVES Roy Orbison!!!!! | CB | |||
| Crackhead Randy the wrist flipper | CB | |||
| Mopey the frustrated wrist flipper! | CB | |||
Hybrid Mode
