wrote:
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote:
"chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC"
wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper?

He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of
stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him
why contribute more/.

That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to
dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open
invitation, why would that be considered stalking.

Stupid ass Mayner. Use your brain.

Evidently, you didn't.

The op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation,
period.

Use _your_ brain.

Jeff


Show me a post where Leland or Doug invited Mopey to "come over and
take
photos and then publish them on the internet along with court records,
wifes name, boss name, place of employment phone number, etc."

You can't.

Therefore it's stalking, according to the definition in the Ohio
statute.

"Menacing by stalking" is a crime under Ohio law. Ohio Revised Code
(R.C.) Section 2903.211. It is also
grounds for seeking and obtaining a Civil Stalking Protection Order
(CPO) or a Criminal Stalking
Protection Order. Ohio's menacing by stalking law provides:

No person by engaging in a pattern of conduct shall knowingly cause
another to believe that the offender
will cause physical harm to the other person or cause mental distress
to the other person.

Any conduct that is in violation of this law constitutes "menacing by
stalking." A "pattern of conduct"
means two or more actions or incidents closely related in time,
whether or not there has been a prior
conviction based on any of those actions or incidents. This very
broad definition of a "pattern of conduct" constituting menacing by
stalking includes, for example, such conduct as: following or
pursuing the
victim; making harassing phone calls to the victim or sending the
victim harassing letters; verbal threats
of physical harm to the victim; driving around the victim's house;
harassing the victim at his/her school or place of employment; and
any other type of conduct intended to threaten, frighten, or
intimidate the
victim. A victim may file a petition for a civil stalking protection
order without filing criminal menacing by stalking charges against
his/her stalker. Any violation of a stalking criminal or civil
protection order is itself a crime punishable as contempt of court or
as a separate crime under Ohio Revised
Code (R.C.) Section 2919.27. A motion for a criminal stalking civil
protection order may only be filed when
the victim also files criminal menacing by stalking charges against
his/her stalker, but a petition for a stalking civil protection order
may be filed at any time. A civil stalking protection order will
remain in effect for a longer period of time and may provide greater
protection than a criminal stalking protection order.

Downloadable Files:
* 10.03-A: A Motion for Criminal Stalking Protection Order
* 10.03-B: Criminal Stalking Protection Order (SPO)
* 10.03-D: Petition for Civil Stalking Protection Order (CSPO)
* 10.03-E: Civil Stalking Protection Order (CSPO) EX PARTE
* 10.03-F: Civil Stalking Protection Order (CSPO) Full Hearing
* 10.03-G: Instructions For Obtaining Civil Stalking Protection Order
(CSPO)
* 10.03-H: Warning Concerning Attached Stalking Protection Order
* FULL PACKAGE - All Stalking Court Forms and Instructions

Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2001 Ohio State Legal Services
Association. All rights reserved.

wrote:
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote:
"chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC"
wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper?

He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of
stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him
why contribute more/.

That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to
dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open
invitation, why would that be considered stalking.

Stupid ass Mayner. Use your brain.

Evidently, you didn't.

The op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation,
period.

Use _your_ brain.

Jeff






WTF??? Show me the Ohio Law that states if " the op asks a specific question.
That mitigates any stalking accusation"

You idiot.







Show me a post where Leland or Doug invited Mopey to "come over and
take
photos and then publish them on the internet along with court records,
wifes name, boss name, place of employment phone number, etc."

You can't.

Therefore it's stalking, according to the definition in the Ohio
statute.

"Menacing by stalking" is a crime under Ohio law. Ohio Revised Code
(R.C.) Section 2903.211. It is also
grounds for seeking and obtaining a Civil Stalking Protection Order
(CPO) or a Criminal Stalking
Protection Order. Ohio's menacing by stalking law provides:

No person by engaging in a pattern of conduct shall knowingly cause
another to believe that the offender
will cause physical harm to the other person or cause mental distress
to the other person.

Any conduct that is in violation of this law constitutes "menacing by
stalking." A "pattern of conduct"
means two or more actions or incidents closely related in time,
whether or not there has been a prior
conviction based on any of those actions or incidents. This very
broad definition of a "pattern of conduct" constituting menacing by
stalking includes, for example, such conduct as: following or
pursuing the
victim; making harassing phone calls to the victim or sending the
victim harassing letters; verbal threats
of physical harm to the victim; driving around the victim's house;
harassing the victim at his/her school or place of employment; and
any other type of conduct intended to threaten, frighten, or
intimidate the
victim. A victim may file a petition for a civil stalking protection
order without filing criminal menacing by stalking charges against
his/her stalker. Any violation of a stalking criminal or civil
protection order is itself a crime punishable as contempt of court or
as a separate crime under Ohio Revised
Code (R.C.) Section 2919.27. A motion for a criminal stalking civil
protection order may only be filed when
the victim also files criminal menacing by stalking charges against
his/her stalker, but a petition for a stalking civil protection order
may be filed at any time. A civil stalking protection order will
remain in effect for a longer period of time and may provide greater
protection than a criminal stalking protection order.

Downloadable Files:
* 10.03-A: A Motion for Criminal Stalking Protection Order
* 10.03-B: Criminal Stalking Protection Order (SPO)
* 10.03-D: Petition for Civil Stalking Protection Order (CSPO)
* 10.03-E: Civil Stalking Protection Order (CSPO) EX PARTE
* 10.03-F: Civil Stalking Protection Order (CSPO) Full Hearing
* 10.03-G: Instructions For Obtaining Civil Stalking Protection Order
(CSPO)
* 10.03-H: Warning Concerning Attached Stalking Protection Order
* FULL PACKAGE - All Stalking Court Forms and Instructions

Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2001 Ohio State Legal Services
Association. All rights reserved.

wrote in message ...
wrote:
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote:
"chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC"
wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper?

He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of
stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him
why contribute more/.

That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to
dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open
invitation, why would that be considered stalking.

Stupid ass Mayner. Use your brain.

Evidently, you didn't.

The op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation,
period.

Use _your_ brain.

Jeff






WTF??? Show me the Ohio Law that states if " the op asks a specific
question.
That mitigates any stalking accusation"

You wrote on Oct 16 2004:
hey assflap, you can't prove those pics are real so go ahead keep
avoiding the issue it only makes you look more like a liar LOL.

Squirm, squirm, ,,,squirm, squirm squirming. aaaaaaaaaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Report to my office, nadia.

wrote in message ...
wrote:
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote:
"chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC"
wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper?

He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of
stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him
why contribute more/.

That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to
dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open
invitation, why would that be considered stalking.

Stupid ass Mayner. Use your brain.

Evidently, you didn't.

The op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation,
period.

Use _your_ brain.

Jeff






WTF??? Show me the Ohio Law that states if " the op asks a specific
question.
That mitigates any stalking accusation"

You wrote on Oct 16 2004:
hey assflap, you can't prove those pics are real so go ahead keep
avoiding the issue it only makes you look more like a liar LOL.

Squirm, squirm, ,,,squirm, squirm squirming. aaaaaaaaaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Report to my office, nadia.



Look up peoples info and threaten all you want, Mopathetic.
It's all you can do, because you are truly powerless to do anything
else. You certainly won't dare to show your face in person. LOL.

wrote:
You certainly won't dare to show your face in person. LOL.

Where?

wrote:
You certainly won't dare to show your face in person. LOL.

Where?

at any hamfest, at any hams home, at any hams work

wrote:
wrote:
You certainly won't dare to show your face in person. LOL.

Where?

at any hamfest, at any hams home, at any hams work

I'll be in Dayton.

wrote:
You certainly won't dare to show your face in person. LOL.

Where?

anywhere you can be detained and ID'd

On Sat, 7 May 2005 16:04:36 -0700, "Jeff Mayner" wrote:

wrote:
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote:
"chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC"
wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper?

He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of
stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him
why contribute more/.

That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to
dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open
invitation, why would that be considered stalking.

Stupid ass Mayner. Use your brain.

Evidently, you didn't.

The op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation,
period.

Use _your_ brain.


He's an idiot. He calls him a stalker, and he threatened to do the same to me,
only I didn't dare him to. He chose my of all the people here.

Section 8 white trash at its finest.


Vinnie S.

Vinnie S. wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005 16:04:36 -0700, "Jeff Mayner"
wrote:

wrote:
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote:
"chicken boy coward mopathetic lying and running scared of the AKC"
wrote in news:1115465708.349708.222590
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

Why woncha say where yer camping at Dayton, wristflipper?

He wont reply as he knows it would fall under the Ohio law of
stalking and harassment he has already enough evidance aginst him
why contribute more/.

That's a pretty stupid observation right there. If he replys to
dumbass's post to, or about, him, in other words a basic open
invitation, why would that be considered stalking.

Stupid ass Mayner. Use your brain.

Evidently, you didn't.

The op asks a specific question. That mitigates any stalking accusation,
period.

Use _your_ brain.

He's an idiot. He calls him a stalker, and he threatened to do the same
to me, only I didn't dare him to. He chose my of all the people here.

Section 8 white trash at its finest.

Vinnie S.

He's just sore that I asked him about his neighbors.