LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23   Report Post  
Old June 13th 05, 03:11 PM
I AmnotGeorgeBush
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: am (Guy)
Landshark wrote:
"Guy" wrote in message
news:TKMqe.15606$mC.3822@okepread07...
=A0=A0=A0=A0wrote:
Why should people who *want* to use it have


to test for it?



(Why not? If you want to drive, you have to take a test, if you want to
get into college you have to take a test, so what's wrong with if you
are going to use code only about taking a test?
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A 0=A0Landshark )

I don't understand the logic in what you're


saying.


Are there other tests that we should introduce


into society?



That's not what was said.

Should we implement taking a test before you


are deemed qualified to open a credit card


account?


No one is calling for the implementation of more testing.

(snip)

How about just leaving some space in the


ham bands for CW? If it gets used, fine, keep


it. If CW dies out (and it will eventually--us old


timers who got their ham ticket the hard way


will eventually RIP) then reallocate it for other


.modes.



You are advcating the elimination of the tes. Code will not die out
because it gets through
much more than voice.

By the way, I don't remember having to take a


test to get into college.




It's called the SAT.

I have a BS in Computer Science and a


Masters in Computer Information Systems. As
long as I paid my bill, they allowed me to go to
class.



Without an SAT score, you would be subject to a college entrance exam.


And the reason for the test to drive a car is to


show something in the way of being able to


drive a car and not kill someone else while


doing it. I can understand the reason for the


test to drive a car. I can explain valid reasons


for some of my crazy examples above also.


So why test for CW?



Why eliminate it to placate those who are too lazy to earn it? Why are
you for furthering dumbing down an institution that has always tested
for code?


It's not like anyone who attempts to operate


CW without knowing all the letters at an


arbitrary speed will endanger anyone or


themselves while doing it.


Why have a test to operate any mode in any


ham band these days?



Well hell, let's just do away with all testing and allow cash and carry
operation of the hammie bands. It's not like anyone who attempts to
operate on the hammie bands will enanger anyone or themselves while
doing it.

Guy


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Geller Media [email protected] Broadcasting 0 September 19th 03 09:03 PM
FA: Electra 1960 metal transceiver / walkie talkie GS CB 0 August 25th 03 04:54 PM
FA: Electra 1960 metal transceiver / walkie talkie GS Swap 0 August 25th 03 04:54 PM
FA: Vintage 1960 all-metal Electra walkie talkie - works GS CB 0 August 19th 03 07:12 PM
FA: Vintage 1960 all-metal Electra walkie talkie - works GS Swap 0 August 19th 03 07:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017