Cliff wrote:
It is in reference to a fine boatanchor. Old radio, usually 23 channel
with capability of putting a VFO on it and talking from 26.00-28.550.
I have an SBE Console II for sale. I am slowly getting out of CBing so
would let it go for a decent price. These have am/usb/lsb and will
tweak out to a buncha power going out if youo want to go illegal.

Not to mention that VFO's are also illegal to transmit on with CB
radios, which are only permitted fixed channel transmission.

"mopathetic didn't camp at Dayton! CHICKEN BOY!"
wrote:
Cliff wrote:
It is in reference to a fine boatanchor. Old radio, usually 23 channel
with capability of putting a VFO on it and talking from 26.00-28.550.
I have an SBE Console II for sale. I am slowly getting out of CBing so
would let it go for a decent price. These have am/usb/lsb and will
tweak out to a buncha power going out if youo want to go illegal.

Not to mention that VFO's are also illegal to transmit on with CB
radios, which are only permitted fixed channel transmission.

Not to mention made it to the rain report enforcement logs
for jamming the Toledo repeaters, and has a court ordered head shrink and
felony for child abuse.

Just google up to see what a hypocrite loser he is.

On 27 Jun 2005 00:02:33 -0700, "mopathetic didn't camp at Dayton!
CHICKEN BOY!" wrote:

Not to mention that VFO's are also illegal to transmit on with CB
radios, which are only permitted fixed channel transmission.
*****

For receiving purposes only a VFO is legal. But then why have a VFO
only on receive?

james

wrote:
On 27 Jun 2005 00:02:33 -0700, "mopathetic didn't camp at Dayton!
CHICKEN BOY!" wrote:

Not to mention that VFO's are also illegal to transmit on with CB
radios, which are only permitted fixed channel transmission.
*****

For receiving purposes only a VFO is legal. But then why have a VFO
only on receive?

james

It's not that much different from an un-locked clarifier anyway. Go too far
and yore on the next channel. (shocking)

and illegal

On 27 Jun 2005 16:46:22 -0700, "mopathetic didn't camp at Dayton!
CHICKEN BOY!" wrote:

and illegal
****

correct

james

james wrote:

On 27 Jun 2005 16:46:22 -0700, "mopathetic didn't camp at Dayton!
CHICKEN BOY!" wrote:


and illegal

****

correct

james
who cares?

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:05:21 -0400, jim
wrote:

james wrote:

On 27 Jun 2005 16:46:22 -0700, "mopathetic didn't camp at Dayton!
CHICKEN BOY!" wrote:


and illegal

****

correct

james
who cares?
*****

Some do and some don't.

The choice is yours. Choose wisely.

james