RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   CB (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/)
-   -   FAQ (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/80308-re-faq.html)

Frank Gilliland October 21st 05 03:19 PM

FAQ
 


Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?



On 21 Oct 2005 07:05:35 -0700, "Polymath"
wrote in .com:

What is Ham Radio?

Ham Radio is a technical pursuit for those who
are interested in the science of radio wave
propagation and who are also interested in the
way that their radios function. It has a long-standing
tradition of providing a source of engineers who
are born naturals.

Ham Radio awakens in its aficionados a whole-life
fascination with all things technical and gives
an all-abiding curiosity to improve one's scientific
knowledge. It's a great swimming pool, please dive in!

This excitement causes a wish to share the experience
with ones fellow man, and shows itself in the
gentlemanly traditions of Ham Radio.

Radio Hams are in a unique privileged position in that
they can construct and operate their own equipment! No-one
else has this privilege. Users, such as broadcasters,
the po lice and armed farces, CBers and mobile phone
users have to purchase ready-made gear. Manufacturers
are not licensed to operate their gear. Radio Hams
are qualified to design, build and then
operate their own pieces of equipment. They do this
with gusto, and also repair and modify their own
equipment. This is a privilege well worth the effort
to gain, and one to be jealously guarded.

The excitement that drives a Radio Ham starts with
relatively simple technologies at first, perhaps making
his own Wimshurst machine and primary cells. Small pieces
of test equipment follow, possibly multimeters and signal
generators. Then comes receivers and transmitters. It is with
the latter that communication with like-minded technically
motivated people takes off. The scope for technical
development grows with the years
and now encompasses DSP and DDS. There is also a great deal
of excitement in the areas of computer programming to
be learnt and applied.

The technical excitement motivates Radio Hams to compete
with each other to determine who has designed and manufactured
the best-quality station. This competitiveness is found in DXing,
competitions and fox-hunts.

-----OOOOO----

However, beware! A Ham Radio licence is such a
desirable thing to have that there are large
numbers of people who wish to be thought of
as Radio Hams when, in fact, they are nothing
of the kind! Usually such people are a
variation of the CB Radio hobbyist; they buy their
radios off the shelf and send them back to be
repaired; they are not interested in technical discussion
and sneer at those who are; they have no idea how
their radios work inside and have no wish to find out;
they are free with rather silly personal insults;
they have not satisfied any technical qualification
and their licences prevent the use of
self-designed-and-built equipment.

These CB types engage in the competitive activities
with their Cheque-Book-purchased off-the-shelf radios
in a forlorn effort to prove that they are Radio Hams.

No _REAL_ Radio Hams are deceived by such people!

-----ooooo-----

One infallible way to disambiguate the CB Radio Hobbyist
from the _REAL_ Radio Ham is to solicit their view of the
difference between CB Radio and Ham Radio. A Radio Ham will
perceive Ham Radio to be a technical pursuit and will
perceive CB Radio to be a social communications facility
no different in essence to a land-line telephone or a
GSM mobile in the hands of a 6-year-old. Thus a Radio Ham
could also hold a CB licence safe in the knowledge that
such a licence says no more about him than having a land-line
telephone, whilst continuing to regard Ham Radio as a separate
technical pursuit.

A CB Radio hobbyist, on the other hand, sees no difference between
a Ham Radio licence and a CB Radio licence. To him, they are
sisters-under-the-skin. Wrongly, the CB Radio Hobbyist then
tries to classify himself as the equal of the Radio
Ham when, in fact, he is nothing of the kind. A sure sign of
a CB Radio hobbyist is if he holds, or has ever held, a licence
issued under the gangrenous degeneration that is the
M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.

-----ooooo-----

One group of people who claim to be of the standard of
Radio Hams but who are in reality nothing more than an
apology for the failure of a CBer are those class B
licensees who falsely proclaimed that they were against
the use of a Morse Test to control access to the HF
bands, until, that is, a test was introduced at their
intellectual level, the intellectual level of 6-year-olds.

6 year-olds simply lack the mathematical tool kit to
enable them to handle even the simplest algebraic manipulation
for Ohm's Law and thus, the disgraceful Class Ber's in
the aforementioned category are not Radio Hams by any stretch
of the imagination!

Remember - A sure sign of a CB Radio hobbyist is if he holds,
or has ever held, a licence issued under the gangrenous
degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme!



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Polymath October 21st 05 03:30 PM

FAQ
 
Because although CBers are in a different intellectual
class to Radio Hams, it is neither my wish to insult
them nor to enter into a discourse with them.

CBers have the right to besport their habits in the
appropriate place as do all the lower classes, which
in this context is rrcb (and urrcb).

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?



On 21 Oct 2005 07:05:35 -0700, "Polymath"
wrote in .com:

What is Ham Radio?

Ham Radio is a technical pursuit for those who
are interested in the science of radio wave
propagation and who are also interested in the
way that their radios function. It has a long-standing
tradition of providing a source of engineers who
are born naturals.

Ham Radio awakens in its aficionados a whole-life
fascination with all things technical and gives
an all-abiding curiosity to improve one's scientific
knowledge. It's a great swimming pool, please dive in!

This excitement causes a wish to share the experience
with ones fellow man, and shows itself in the
gentlemanly traditions of Ham Radio.

Radio Hams are in a unique privileged position in that
they can construct and operate their own equipment! No-one
else has this privilege. Users, such as broadcasters,
the po lice and armed farces, CBers and mobile phone
users have to purchase ready-made gear. Manufacturers
are not licensed to operate their gear. Radio Hams
are qualified to design, build and then
operate their own pieces of equipment. They do this
with gusto, and also repair and modify their own
equipment. This is a privilege well worth the effort
to gain, and one to be jealously guarded.

The excitement that drives a Radio Ham starts with
relatively simple technologies at first, perhaps making
his own Wimshurst machine and primary cells. Small pieces
of test equipment follow, possibly multimeters and signal
generators. Then comes receivers and transmitters. It is with
the latter that communication with like-minded technically
motivated people takes off. The scope for technical
development grows with the years
and now encompasses DSP and DDS. There is also a great deal
of excitement in the areas of computer programming to
be learnt and applied.

The technical excitement motivates Radio Hams to compete
with each other to determine who has designed and manufactured
the best-quality station. This competitiveness is found in DXing,
competitions and fox-hunts.

-----OOOOO----

However, beware! A Ham Radio licence is such a
desirable thing to have that there are large
numbers of people who wish to be thought of
as Radio Hams when, in fact, they are nothing
of the kind! Usually such people are a
variation of the CB Radio hobbyist; they buy their
radios off the shelf and send them back to be
repaired; they are not interested in technical discussion
and sneer at those who are; they have no idea how
their radios work inside and have no wish to find out;
they are free with rather silly personal insults;
they have not satisfied any technical qualification
and their licences prevent the use of
self-designed-and-built equipment.

These CB types engage in the competitive activities
with their Cheque-Book-purchased off-the-shelf radios
in a forlorn effort to prove that they are Radio Hams.

No _REAL_ Radio Hams are deceived by such people!

-----ooooo-----

One infallible way to disambiguate the CB Radio Hobbyist
from the _REAL_ Radio Ham is to solicit their view of the
difference between CB Radio and Ham Radio. A Radio Ham will
perceive Ham Radio to be a technical pursuit and will
perceive CB Radio to be a social communications facility
no different in essence to a land-line telephone or a
GSM mobile in the hands of a 6-year-old. Thus a Radio Ham
could also hold a CB licence safe in the knowledge that
such a licence says no more about him than having a land-line
telephone, whilst continuing to regard Ham Radio as a separate
technical pursuit.

A CB Radio hobbyist, on the other hand, sees no difference between
a Ham Radio licence and a CB Radio licence. To him, they are
sisters-under-the-skin. Wrongly, the CB Radio Hobbyist then
tries to classify himself as the equal of the Radio
Ham when, in fact, he is nothing of the kind. A sure sign of
a CB Radio hobbyist is if he holds, or has ever held, a licence
issued under the gangrenous degeneration that is the
M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.

-----ooooo-----

One group of people who claim to be of the standard of
Radio Hams but who are in reality nothing more than an
apology for the failure of a CBer are those class B
licensees who falsely proclaimed that they were against
the use of a Morse Test to control access to the HF
bands, until, that is, a test was introduced at their
intellectual level, the intellectual level of 6-year-olds.

6 year-olds simply lack the mathematical tool kit to
enable them to handle even the simplest algebraic manipulation
for Ohm's Law and thus, the disgraceful Class Ber's in
the aforementioned category are not Radio Hams by any stretch
of the imagination!

Remember - A sure sign of a CB Radio hobbyist is if he holds,
or has ever held, a licence issued under the gangrenous
degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme!



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----



[email protected] October 21st 05 04:06 PM

FAQ
 

Polymath wrote:
Because although CBers are in a different intellectual
class to Radio Hams,

You just demonstrated that you are one of the worst discrimination
idiots I
have ever met on Usenet, and I have been on Usenet for 13 years.
On radio much much longer.
Look little motherf*cker, there are even professors on CB.
And there are clearly complete idiots like you that accidently got
an amateur radio license on the amateur bands.

*Even if you get an amateur license, you are STILL an amateur.*

Actually I worked in professional broadcasting and designed
professional
transmitters.
You just convinced me NOT to listen on amateur frequencies.
F*cking idiot moron.
hehe


Jock. October 21st 05 04:39 PM

FAQ
 
On 21 Oct 2005 08:06:04 -0700, wrote:

You just demonstrated that you are one of the worst discrimination
idiots I have ever met on Usenet, and I have been on Usenet for 13
years. On radio much much longer. Look little motherf*cker, there
are even professors on CB.


My goodness! Professors of what?

And there are clearly complete idiots like you that accidently got
an amateur radio license on the amateur bands.

*Even if you get an amateur license, you are STILL an amateur.*

Actually I worked in professional broadcasting and designed
professional transmitters.


Golly! CB transmitters?

You just convinced me NOT to listen on amateur frequencies.
F*cking idiot moron.
hehe


Not difficult to deduce that you are a CB-er.

--

73 de Jock.

"Choice has always been a privilege of those who
could afford to pay for it."
- Ellen Frankfort

The Magnum October 21st 05 07:11 PM

FAQ
 
Hold about a bit matey boy... Just because someone uses a CB doesnt make
them a lower class person or less intellectual than an Amateur radio user.
They may have brains far exceeding yours on several topics, just not on
radio. Just because you know a bit about radio doesnt make you a higher
class of person... IT JUST MEANS YOU KNOW ABOUT RADIO'S..... now try
learning common sense, respect for ones fellow man and remember.. Amateur
Radio.. Just like CB.. is JUST A HOBBY...
I love the bit though where you say "it is neither my wish to insult them"
but you manage to do it anyhow...
10-4 over and out .. or in your case QRT..

"Polymath" wrote in message
oups.com...
Because although CBers are in a different intellectual
class to Radio Hams, it is neither my wish to insult
them nor to enter into a discourse with them.

CBers have the right to besport their habits in the
appropriate place as do all the lower classes, which
in this context is rrcb (and urrcb).






The Magnum October 21st 05 07:14 PM

FAQ
 

Not difficult to deduce that you are a CB-er.


Why is that then.. is it because he has friends, his house isn't full of
bits of old crap and he doesnt stink of wee and biscuits??



huLLy October 21st 05 07:19 PM

FAQ
 
The Magnum wrote:
Hold about a bit matey boy... Just because someone uses a CB doesnt
make them a lower class person or less intellectual than an Amateur
radio user. They may have brains far exceeding yours on several
topics, just not on radio. Just because you know a bit about radio
doesnt make you a higher class of person... IT JUST MEANS YOU KNOW
ABOUT RADIO'S..... now try learning common sense, respect for ones
fellow man and remember.. Amateur Radio.. Just like CB.. is JUST A
HOBBY...
I love the bit though where you say "it is neither my wish to insult
them" but you manage to do it anyhow...
10-4 over and out .. or in your case QRT..


Poly Parrot has forgotten he has owned a CB and a license (still does, I
expect), ignore him.. having been arrested he is a prime example of what
amateur radio has descended to.
--
huLLy
Mobile phone 07976 123278
ICQ 136-987-925



[email protected] October 21st 05 07:44 PM

FAQ
 

huLLy wrote:
The Magnum wrote:
Hold about a bit matey boy... Just because someone uses a CB doesnt
make them a lower class person or less intellectual than an Amateur
radio user. They may have brains far exceeding yours on several
topics, just not on radio. Just because you know a bit about radio
doesnt make you a higher class of person... IT JUST MEANS YOU KNOW
ABOUT RADIO'S..... now try learning common sense, respect for ones
fellow man and remember.. Amateur Radio.. Just like CB.. is JUST A
HOBBY...
I love the bit though where you say "it is neither my wish to insult
them" but you manage to do it anyhow...
10-4 over and out .. or in your case QRT..


Poly Parrot has forgotten he has owned a CB and a license (still does, I
expect), ignore him.. having been arrested he is a prime example of what
amateur radio has descended to.
--
huLLy
Mobile phone 07976 123278
ICQ 136-987-925


Does he get on there with a linear and talk to W4LLI, Billy Jack like
he used to do on 75/80 meters?


Polymath October 21st 05 07:51 PM

FAQ
 
Unbeknown to me, this thread had already been cross-posted to
the CB groups, and I would have removed that cross-posting
had I been aware of it.

In respect of that, I apologise if my remarks have caused
any offence to the CB community. However, I do not
withdraw my remarks - they are my opinion as to the
relative standing of Radio Hams and of CB Radio
enthusiasts where the playing-field is that of Radio
Hams.

However, having said that, the material quoted below
serves, I think, to illustrate quite well the
intellectual standing of CB Radio enthusiasts
upon which I have commented.....

wrote:
you are one of the worst.....idiots.....
little motherf*cker.....complete idiots like
you.....F*cking idiot moron.



[email protected] October 21st 05 08:05 PM

FAQ
 
Especially for you.


[email protected] October 21st 05 08:09 PM

FAQ
 

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
wrote:
Polymath wrote:

Because although CBers are in a different intellectual
class to Radio Hams,


You just demonstrated that you are one of the worst discrimination
idiots I
have ever met on Usenet, and I have been on Usenet for 13 years.
On radio much much longer.
Look little motherf*cker, there are even professors on CB.
And there are clearly complete idiots like you that accidently got
an amateur radio license on the amateur bands.

*Even if you get an amateur license, you are STILL an amateur.*

Actually I worked in professional broadcasting and designed
professional
transmitters.


So how many cb transmittes you designed?


As if you ever designed anything.


You just convinced me NOT to listen on amateur frequencies.
F*cking idiot moron.
hehe


Roger that thar, ten-fer gud buddy, squwak-squeek, gotge ears on thar
gud buddy, bring-it on MFer, aaaaaaaaauuuuuuuuuddddddddiiiiiiiiooooooooooo.


You post like you have experience talking on it, loser.


Cmd Buzz Corey October 21st 05 09:00 PM

FAQ
 
Frank Gilliland wrote:

Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?


Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for cbers
to comprehend.

[email protected] October 21st 05 09:01 PM

FAQ
 

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:

Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?


Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for cbers
to comprehend.


Especially you.


Cmd Buzz Corey October 21st 05 09:08 PM

FAQ
 
wrote:
Polymath wrote:

Because although CBers are in a different intellectual
class to Radio Hams,


You just demonstrated that you are one of the worst discrimination
idiots I
have ever met on Usenet, and I have been on Usenet for 13 years.
On radio much much longer.
Look little motherf*cker, there are even professors on CB.
And there are clearly complete idiots like you that accidently got
an amateur radio license on the amateur bands.

*Even if you get an amateur license, you are STILL an amateur.*

Actually I worked in professional broadcasting and designed
professional
transmitters.


So how many cb transmittes you designed?

You just convinced me NOT to listen on amateur frequencies.
F*cking idiot moron.
hehe


Roger that thar, ten-fer gud buddy, squwak-squeek, gotge ears on thar
gud buddy, bring-it on MFer, aaaaaaaaauuuuuuuuuddddddddiiiiiiiiooooooooooo.

Jock. October 21st 05 10:10 PM

FAQ
 
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:11:52 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

Hold about a bit matey boy... Just because someone uses a CB doesnt make
them a lower class person or less intellectual than an Amateur radio user.
They may have brains far exceeding yours on several topics, just not on
radio. Just because you know a bit about radio doesnt make you a higher
class of person... IT JUST MEANS YOU KNOW ABOUT RADIO'S..... now try
learning common sense, respect for ones fellow man and remember.. Amateur
Radio.. Just like CB.. is JUST A HOBBY...
I love the bit though where you say "it is neither my wish to insult them"
but you manage to do it anyhow...
10-4 over and out .. or in your case QRT..


Another CB-er and potential F-class adherent.

(You can spot them the minute they put finger to keyboard).

--

73 de Jock.

"Choice has always been a privilege of those who
could afford to pay for it."
- Ellen Frankfort

I AmnotGeorgeBush October 21st 05 10:31 PM

FAQ
 
From: (Polymath)
Because although CBers are in a different


intellectual class to Radio Hams,


Some of those cb'ers ARE what you call "Radio Hams."

it is neither my wish to insult them nor to enter


into a discourse with them.


You already did by insisting a different intellectual class exists
between the two, although you refrained from
expressing your prejudice of preference.
I hunt frequently with a teacher at the University of South Florida and
he has a cb in his SUV. Another guy in our hunt club is a "Radio Ham"
and never finished high school. On the flip ide, we have a lawyer who is
also a local coach who is a licensed Radio Ham and many commercial
fishermen use cb. At times the commercial fishermen are bringing in more
green than the university professor AND the lawyer put together. Does
that in essence make the fishermen of a higher intellect because he can
make a better income? No, it certainly doesn't, unless you are of the
ilk that measures a man by his monetary worth.


CBers have the right to besport their habits in


the appropriate place as do all the lower


classes, which in this context is rrcb (and


urrcb).



Sorry that a cb'er, possibly an advanced or extra Radio Ham, rained on
your parade at some point. Get over it and lose the chip on your
shoulder so you can make statements that don't illustrate such
ignorance.


I AmnotGeorgeBush October 21st 05 10:39 PM

FAQ
 
From: (Polymath)
Unbeknown to me, this thread had already


been cross-posted to the CB groups,



By a Radio Ham.

and I would have removed that cross-posting


had I been aware of it.



And how would you have done that?

In respect of that, I apologise if my remarks


have caused any offence to the CB


community.



Your remarks couldn't cause offense to anyone among these pages.

However, I do not withdraw my remarks - they


are my opinion as to the relative standing of


Radio Hams and of CB Radio enthusiasts




And that is what is gret about usenet. One can express their opinion
openly.

where the playing-field is that of Radio Hams.


However, having said that, the material quoted
below serves, I think, to illustrate quite well the
intellectual standing of CB Radio enthusiasts


upon which I have commented.....



You were doing so well by admitting it was but your opinion you were
expressing. Now that you have managed to paint all those who use a cb
with a single wide brush, you need adhere your own rule. Google "N8WWM".
Read. Enjoy. Is it now safe to say his posts serve as the intellectual
standing of Radio Hams? Of course not. It merely illustrates your
incompetence regarding communications with your fellow man. Thank you
for illustrating what has become one of the most extreme examples of
irony amongst our radio hobby.....some of those licensed for radio
communications know the least of it. You sir, epitomize the example.



NetKKop October 21st 05 11:03 PM

FAQ
 
Now stop this at once please Children! GROW UP

--
--
73deG1LVN(M0WWS)
it's back it's: http://qsy.to/ChorleyFM !!
http://www.g1lvn.org.uk/wavefiles/


"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
m...
wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:

Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?

Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for cbers
to comprehend.



Especially you.


Hey wogie, tell us all about that negative swr. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!




Cmd Buzz Corey October 21st 05 11:27 PM

FAQ
 
wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:

Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?


Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for cbers
to comprehend.



Especially you.


Hey wogie, tell us all about that negative swr. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!

N0VFP October 22nd 05 04:21 AM

FAQ
 

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:

Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?

Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for cbers
to comprehend.



Especially you.


Hey wogie, tell us all about that negative swr. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!


Hey, dumbass, tell us how you have a "pilot's license"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!


N0VFP October 22nd 05 04:22 AM

FAQ
 
Cmd Buzz Corey will try to sell you pictures of his naked granddaughter.


an_old_friend October 22nd 05 05:31 AM

FAQ
 

NetKKop wrote:
Now stop this at once please Children! GROW UP


good luck with them

I truely do wish you luck

--
--
73deG1LVN(M0WWS)
it's back it's: http://qsy.to/ChorleyFM !!
http://www.g1lvn.org.uk/wavefiles/


"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
m...
wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:

Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?

Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for cbers
to comprehend.


Especially you.


Hey wogie, tell us all about that negative swr. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!



[email protected] October 22nd 05 05:34 AM

FAQ
 

an_old_friend wrote:
NetKKop wrote:
Now stop this at once please Children! GROW UP


good luck with them

I truely do wish you luck


You need all the mental help you can get, Marky.


an_old_friend October 22nd 05 05:48 AM

FAQ
 

wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
NetKKop wrote:
Now stop this at once please Children! GROW UP


good luck with them

I truely do wish you luck


You need all the mental help you can get, Marky.


not really but do grow up

you could Mr Slit by using a real name or at least some that is not so
stupid


Keyclowns are limpwristed October 22nd 05 06:37 AM

FAQ
 
No, twitlips...you are a just a queenboy who can't do anything but
copy/paste. The only original thing you do is with a new truck driver
every night.


The Magnum October 22nd 05 10:06 AM

FAQ
 

"Polymath" wrote in message
ups.com...
Unbeknown to me, this thread had already been cross-posted to
the CB groups, and I would have removed that cross-posting
had I been aware of it.

In respect of that, I apologise if my remarks have caused
any offence to the CB community. However, I do not
withdraw my remarks - they are my opinion as to the
relative standing of Radio Hams and of CB Radio
enthusiasts where the playing-field is that of Radio
Hams.

However, having said that, the material quoted below
serves, I think, to illustrate quite well the
intellectual standing of CB Radio enthusiasts
upon which I have commented.....

wrote:
you are one of the worst.....idiots.....
little motherf*cker.....complete idiots like
you.....F*cking idiot moron.


In the realms of talking specifically about radio apology accepted but
everyone swears at some time. Amateurs included. While i dont condone it i
can understand it. If you upset someone enough you "will" get this sort of
response. Im a CB'er by the way.
Regards,
Graham



The Magnum October 22nd 05 10:12 AM

FAQ
 

Roger that thar, ten-fer gud buddy, squwak-squeek, gotge ears on thar
gud buddy, bring-it on MFer,

aaaaaaaaauuuuuuuuuddddddddiiiiiiiiooooooooooo.

You post like you have experience talking on it, loser.



Do you know, in all my years of CB radio use ive never actually heard anyone
talk like that on the CB. Ive been on since 1979 (not continuously, i do let
go the mic occasionally ;o) The only people who talk like that are people
who have no real idea of CB and are just taking the Mick. Am i wrong?? do
people talk like that on the CB where you live?? Let us know where these
people are so we can avoid them ....
Graham



The Magnum October 22nd 05 10:16 AM

FAQ
 

"huLLy" wrote in message
...
The Magnum wrote:
Hold about a bit matey boy... Just because someone uses a CB doesnt
make them a lower class person or less intellectual than an Amateur
radio user. They may have brains far exceeding yours on several
topics, just not on radio. Just because you know a bit about radio
doesnt make you a higher class of person... IT JUST MEANS YOU KNOW
ABOUT RADIO'S..... now try learning common sense, respect for ones
fellow man and remember.. Amateur Radio.. Just like CB.. is JUST A
HOBBY...
I love the bit though where you say "it is neither my wish to insult
them" but you manage to do it anyhow...
10-4 over and out .. or in your case QRT..


Poly Parrot has forgotten he has owned a CB and a license (still does, I
expect), ignore him.. having been arrested he is a prime example of what
amateur radio has descended to.
--
huLLy
Mobile phone 07976 123278
ICQ 136-987-925


Hi Hully,
Unfortunately there are a few like him on the Amateur band. Its a shame
really. Its meant to be a hobby after all and his attitude will put many
prospective new Amateurs off as they will see it as an unfriendly place. Not
good for the cause..
Regards,
Graham



The Magnum October 22nd 05 10:18 AM

FAQ
 

"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
Frank Gilliland wrote:

Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?


Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for cbers
to comprehend.


You seem to think the average person would be interested..... suprising
that. Now careful on that pedistall. Id hate for you to fall and hurt
yourself.



The Magnum October 22nd 05 10:23 AM

FAQ
 

"Jock." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:11:52 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

Hold about a bit matey boy... Just because someone uses a CB doesnt make
them a lower class person or less intellectual than an Amateur radio

user.
They may have brains far exceeding yours on several topics, just not on
radio. Just because you know a bit about radio doesnt make you a higher
class of person... IT JUST MEANS YOU KNOW ABOUT RADIO'S..... now try
learning common sense, respect for ones fellow man and remember.. Amateur
Radio.. Just like CB.. is JUST A HOBBY...
I love the bit though where you say "it is neither my wish to insult

them"
but you manage to do it anyhow...
10-4 over and out .. or in your case QRT..


Another CB-er and potential F-class adherent.

(You can spot them the minute they put finger to keyboard).


Are you referring to me dear boy? Now perhaps you could explain your
remarkable assumption. Perhaps its the bit where i dont pamper to the
"mighty Amateur holier than tho attitude" .. who knows, ill wait for your
reply..

73 de Jock.

"Choice has always been a privilege of those who
could afford to pay for it."
- Ellen Frankfort




Steveo October 22nd 05 11:33 AM

FAQ
 
"N0VFP" wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:

Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?

Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for
cbers to comprehend.


Especially you.


Hey wogie, tell us all about that negative swr. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!


Hey, dumbass, tell us how you have a "pilot's license"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

Is "Cmd Buzz Corey" a CB handle, or the name this anonymous no code
****stain uses on Usenet? He fakes being a pilot too? lol

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

The Magnum October 22nd 05 12:03 PM

FAQ
 

"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:12:56 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote:

Do you know, in all my years of CB radio use ive never actually heard

anyone
talk like that on the CB. Ive been on since 1979 (not continuously, i do

let
go the mic occasionally ;o) The only people who talk like that are people
who have no real idea of CB and are just taking the Mick. Am i wrong?? do
people talk like that on the CB where you live?? Let us know where these
people are so we can avoid them ....


Everyone on CB in the Cardiff and Swansea areas talks like that.

Except that in the Cardiff area, they don't have "handles" ... they
have "angles". As in, "The angle by yer would be Smokey Joe, and the
personal would be Dai".


I used to live in Swansea many moons ago, Ammanford to be exact, a few miles
west of Cardiff i know but still in the general area. Theres some CB type
talk obviously like whats yer 20 is it.... or give me a roger boyo but the
way some people come out on here with their parrot CB lingo its obvious they
are just taking the mick. As far as angle goes maybe they want a 90
degree'ing :o)

This probably originates from someone, in the dim and distant past,
having misheard the word "handle" as "angle" (not difficult,
considering the way Cardiff people speak) ... and the error has been
perpetuated.

73 de G3NYY

--
Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com




[email protected] October 22nd 05 01:14 PM

FAQ
 

Steveo wrote:
"N0VFP" wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:

Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?

Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for
cbers to comprehend.


Especially you.


Hey wogie, tell us all about that negative swr. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!


Hey, dumbass, tell us how you have a "pilot's license"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

Is "Cmd Buzz Corey" a CB handle, or the name this anonymous no code
****stain uses on Usenet? He fakes being a pilot too? lol


Indeed. He claims to have both a now obsolete advanced ham ticket,
(unlikely) and a pilot's license (highly unlikely.)! But he hides
behind a cheezy handle swiped from a cheezy 50's sci-fi show.


Steveo October 22nd 05 01:35 PM

FAQ
 
wrote:
Steveo wrote:
"N0VFP" wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:

Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb?

Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for
cbers to comprehend.


Especially you.


Hey wogie, tell us all about that negative swr. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!

Hey, dumbass, tell us how you have a "pilot's license"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

Is "Cmd Buzz Corey" a CB handle, or the name this anonymous no code
****stain uses on Usenet? He fakes being a pilot too? lol


Indeed. He claims to have both a now obsolete advanced ham ticket,
(unlikely) and a pilot's license (highly unlikely.)! But he hides
behind a cheezy handle swiped from a cheezy 50's sci-fi show.

He nym shifts too, he used to post as "JJ" from that TV show goodtimes..his
CB handle was 'kid dynomite' back in the CB boom of the 70's. What a putz.

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

[email protected] October 22nd 05 01:44 PM

FAQ
 
The Cmd of buttholes sure hasn't made any "DYNO-MITE" pronouncements on
the internet, has he?


jim October 22nd 05 03:37 PM

FAQ
 
The Magnum wrote:
Not difficult to deduce that you are a CB-er.



Why is that then.. is it because he has friends, his house isn't full of
bits of old crap and he doesnt stink of wee and biscuits??


biscuits?

Steveo October 22nd 05 03:37 PM

FAQ
 
wrote:
The Cmd of buttholes sure hasn't made any "DYNO-MITE" pronouncements on
the internet, has he?

He still loves his CB.

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

an_old_friend October 22nd 05 03:54 PM

FAQ
 

The Magnum wrote:
Roger that thar, ten-fer gud buddy, squwak-squeek, gotge ears on thar
gud buddy, bring-it on MFer,

aaaaaaaaauuuuuuuuuddddddddiiiiiiiiooooooooooo.

You post like you have experience talking on it, loser.



Do you know, in all my years of CB radio use ive never actually heard anyone
talk like that on the CB. Ive been on since 1979 (not continuously, i do let
go the mic occasionally ;o) The only people who talk like that are people
who have no real idea of CB and are just taking the Mick. Am i wrong?? do
people talk like that on the CB where you live?? Let us know where these
people are so we can avoid them ....


closest I have ever heard to such is the guy who clearly has a his rig
out of tune and you can't tell what he is saying, but they are the
occasional exception
Graham



jim October 22nd 05 03:55 PM

FAQ
 
Steveo wrote:

wrote:

The Cmd of buttholes sure hasn't made any "DYNO-MITE" pronouncements on
the internet, has he?


He still loves his CB.

only in the biblical sense i take it...

Steveo October 22nd 05 04:08 PM

FAQ
 
jim wrote:
Steveo wrote:

wrote:

The Cmd of buttholes sure hasn't made any "DYNO-MITE" pronouncements on
the internet, has he?


He still loves his CB.

only in the biblical sense i take it...

Dunno, he can hardly post without mentioning CB.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com