Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 12th 06, 12:51 AM posted to rec.radio.cb
Telstar Electronics
 
Posts: n/a
Default DSB SC Mode

I looked at your document. It's exactly what I'm talking about AM...
without a solid carrier at no modulation. That's exactly what mode I'm
running. With my amplifier being able to key on a multiplexed signal
from my radio... The DSB-SC mode really is impressive on the air at
high power levels. I would never go back to pure AM mode. And you
already know my feelings about SSB... it's got too many negatives for
my liking.

www.telstar-electronics.com

  #2   Report Post  
Old June 12th 06, 11:26 AM posted to rec.radio.cb
Jan Panteltje
 
Posts: n/a
Default DSB SC Mode

On a sunny day (11 Jun 2006 16:51:31 -0700) it happened "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
.com:

I looked at your document. It's exactly what I'm talking about AM...
without a solid carrier at no modulation. That's exactly what mode I'm
running. With my amplifier being able to key on a multiplexed signal
from my radio... The DSB-SC mode really is impressive on the air at
high power levels. I would never go back to pure AM mode. And you
already know my feelings about SSB... it's got too many negatives for
my liking.

www.telstar-electronics.com

Hmmm does not clear up confusion, do you receive it with an AM receiver
and no BFO? Then it is no DSB-SC.

There exist AM modulation modes where the carrier is somewhat reduced during
low modulation levels..... This wil lwork, but is still AM.
Maybe that is what you mean?

You will note the 'double phase rectifier' like waveform for DBS-SC.
In case of that modified AM you have sine wave.

So: if you can receive it on an AM receiver without BFO it is AM or
a variant there of.
If you need a BFO in any way it is DSB-SC, SSB, LSB, USB whatever.

As far as range is concerned, SSB DSB will beat any system (with SSB being
better then DSB).

The variable carrier level AM, if used to give some 'extra' power to the AM
stage at high amplitudes, will give some extra rane.
however for weak passages in the audio there will be more noise then a similar
AM system with noraml carrier, as simply there will be less carrier output.

Some AM broadcast statons, if not all? Use that system.

But who knows HiFi these days.. mp3... low bitrates...





  #3   Report Post  
Old June 12th 06, 01:35 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
Telstar Electronics
 
Posts: n/a
Default DSB SC Mode

I guess you're right. In the strictest sense DSB-SC, there is no
transmission of the carrier at all. That is not the mode I'm talking
about. I guess I was using DSB-SC interchangably with the mode where
the carrier is only temporarily supressed. I would certainly not be
interested in the mode where the carrier is no longer transmitted...
for the same reason I don't like like the SSB mode... mainly the
constant fussing over the tuning. Thanks for the correction...

www.telstar-electronics.com

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BETTER HF FREQUENCY PLAN for AMATEUR RADIO Expeditionradio Policy 3 January 27th 04 10:50 PM
Mode for Best Throughput? Andy Knitt Digital 0 November 5th 03 02:56 AM
Icom T2H ANI Mode Michael Ko Equipment 10 October 23rd 03 07:59 PM
Icom T2H ANI Mode Michael Ko Equipment 0 October 9th 03 09:13 PM
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE http://CBC.am/ Shortwave 0 July 16th 03 08:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017