Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On a sunny day (Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:13:42 GMT) it happened Bob Dobbs EC42
wrote in pan.2006.06.12.13.13.40.351000@Quetzalcoatl: On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 14:38:54 +0000, Jan Panteltje wrote: Something wrong here, DSB-SC received on a normal set can only be made 'inteligible' if it is received as SSB. SSB is simply one sideband of the 2 DSB sends, so your BFO is [just as] critical. DSB-SC can be received by an ordinary AM detector, no BFO required. The two sidebands work with one another to provide the entirety of the signal so there is no garble effect as encountered when one of the sidebands is suppressed. Bull****. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BETTER HF FREQUENCY PLAN for AMATEUR RADIO | Policy | |||
Mode for Best Throughput? | Digital | |||
Icom T2H ANI Mode | Equipment | |||
Icom T2H ANI Mode | Equipment | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |