Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Casey wrote in news:PxAod.10361$Qh3.9984
@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net: At least the FCC did do something about club calls. They took 42 of them away from a JA few years back :-) But for some strange reason, they let him keep his primary station license, a W9 extra class U.S. call. 73, Jim KH2D Maybe they should get calls like WJ#XXX, or KJ#XXX... If the FCC decides that it's proper for foriegners to get American ham licenses..... Foreigners have been able to get US licences for many decades. I'm one. Only representatives of a foreign government can't get a US call. Try reading Part 97. 73 de Alun, N3KIP |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On 23 Nov 2004 06:29:39 GMT, Alun wrote:
Foreigners have been able to get US licences for many decades. I'm one. Only representatives of a foreign government can't get a US call. Try reading Part 97. 73 de Alun, N3KIP I have read it. A few times. If you live in the U.S. and get a U.S. license, I doubt there's any complaints. If you live in Germany, have never been to the U.S., and never intend to go to the U.S., I doubt many people would deem it necessary for you to have a U.S. license. 73, Jim KH2D |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On 24 Nov 2004 01:31:47 GMT, Alun wrote:
Quite true, but if you live in Germany and nip down to your local USAF facility for a VE sesion you can get a US licence, all legal and above board. There's an obvious solution. If someone takes a VE test overseas and has no US address, they ought to be given a sequentially issued call in one of the less populous FCC districts, say the 1st district. Or they should be told to buzz off. Why should any U.S. license be issued to someone in a foreign country that has no intention of using it in the U.S. ? And with the CEPT stuff, there's even more reason not to issue U.S. licenses in many countries. 73, Jim KH2D |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On 26 Nov 2004 04:22:50 GMT, Alun wrote:
However, anyone who has a licence from a country that has an ordinary bilateral reciprocal agrrement with the US can operate in the US even as a permanent resident for an indefinite period of time. An excellent reason to never issue a U.S. call sign to a Japanese ham. There is no circumstance where they'd NEED a U.S. license, because they can operate in the U.S. or in any U.S. territory with their Japanese license. Throw stroke whatever on the end of their JA call and they're good to go. No paperwork required, no resources wasted. So maybe you'd like to ban VE tests held outside the US? That would be hard on your military. How do you get licenced if you are posted somewhere that you don't speak the language? No, I wouldn't. You go to the U.S. Embassy or a U.S. military base and take the test. Think about this - How do you pass a test in Japan that's in English if you don't speak English? Remember that song from the 70's? With a little help from your friends? Another suggestion I saw in this thread was to stop aliens from being VEs. I don't think that would fly constitutionally speaking either. You're missing the whole point, Alun. The U.S. Constitution does NOT apply to Japanese nationals who live in Japan. You live in the U.S. You're a VE, and help other VE's in the U.S. give tests. That's wonderful, and the fact that you're not a U.S. citizen doesn't bother me a bit. I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not sure you have any constitutional rights in the U.S. or that you were allowed to vote in the presidential election, but that's not the point here. If three Filipino's give a VE test for licenses in the Philippines, that bothers me. If three Japanese hams give a VE test for U.S. licenses in Tokyo, that bothers me. And I'm sure it would bother a lot of other hams in the U.S. So, what do you seriously suggest? Cut out the world wide bogus VE testing. If you are U.S. military or U.S. civilian overseas, you go to the U.S. Embassy or a U.S. military base and take the test. And you prove to the people administering the test that the address you put on the 610 form is REALLY where you live, and not a P.O. Box at Mailboxes Plus that you and your buddies chipped in to pay for, or the P.O. Box number of the Guam QSL bureau. I don't really think anyone cares if someone in Japan can get a call that belongs to the mainland US. I think if you did a poll of U.S. hams, you'd find that thinking is way out in left field. Maybe it'll help you see the big picture if we sum it up one more time: If you are a ham from ANY country and you LIVE in the U.S., and you can't operate in the U.S. under CEPT agreements, then by all means you should be allowed to take the test (in the U.S.) and get a U.S. license. BUT - If you're a ham that lives in the Philippines, and you think it would be neato keen kool as a moose to have a U.S. license just for the hell of it, you should NOT be allowed to get one - and most certainly not when the test is given by three other Filipino hams who have never been to the U.S. but somehow managed to get U.S. licenses and sign up with W5YI. Wouldn't it have been nice if all the final exams we took in school were administered by our classmates at the bowling alley on Saturday night with no teachers around to watch? I bet if we used that system, it wouldn't have taken me eight years to finish high school..... AND - If you are a Japanese ham that lives in Japan, and you think that it would be kewl to have a U.S. license so that when you go to VP9 for vacation you can pretend you're from the U.S. so you're allowed to operate in VP9, or because a U.S. call would look kewl on your QSL card, you should NOT be allowed to get one. Nobody has a problem with hams that are REALLY in the U.S. getting a license, no matter where they were born and raised. It's not a citizenship thing. Nobody has a problem with you getting a license in the U.S. even though you don't really need one, because you ARE in the U.S. The problem is with hams who have NEVER been in the U.S., or never intend to BE in the U.S. getting licenses they don't really need or ever intend to use in the U.S. OR that they intend to use as an International Radio Passport. Example: All the KH0/KH2/KH7/Wxxx calls issued to JA's. Some of them operate in Guam or Saipan, once, or once in a while. Many don't ever operate there. Now that the CEPT agreement covers Japan, they don't NEED a U.S. license so it's a waste of resources and call signs to issue them one and it allows them to falsely present themselves as U.S. hams in other countries to obtain reciprocal operating privledges that they couldn't get with a Japanese license. Before CEPT if they wanted to operate in Guam, they had to get a U.S. license or a reciprocal license. Those days are over. Why shouldn't 3 JA's be allowed to test me for a U.S. ham license in Japan? The same reason I can't take a test for a Florida drivers license in Japan at the Tokyo Motor Vehicle Department. Because it makes no damn sense. 73, Jim KH2D |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On 26 Nov 2004 04:22:50 GMT, Alun wrote:
So, what do you seriously suggest? I call this the Ferner radio act of 2005: The first thing that must be done is to determine what is a desirable callsign. Although we can't tell in all cases, most would agree that: 1X2 2X1 1X3 2X2 are the most desirable 2X3 licenses are the least desirable of the lot. But! some may find them desirable. So in the interest of finding the least desriable callsigns for ferners to use, I would suggest that we make a new class of 5X5 callsigns. This would keep the callsigns away from the prefixes already assigned to the different countries, and would eliminate any question of ferners gobbling up those desirable ones. It will be important to have an oversight committee set up to make sure that the callsign is not accidentally desireable. Efforts must be made so that no feren ham has his or her initials in their callsign. All testing must take place at an embassy, and be approved by the respective countries legislative branches, as well as the respectice countries radio commissions. The ferner must pay for a specially trained and reputable VE to be flown to the place of testing. How's that? ...............CQ CQ CQ de KAESB3WRTCD............... hmmmm - Mike KB3EIA - |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On 26 Nov 2004 04:22:50 GMT, Alun wrote:
So, what do you seriously suggest? I call this the Ferner radio act of 2005: The first thing that must be done is to determine what is a desirable callsign. Although we can't tell in all cases, most would agree that: 1X2 2X1 1X3 2X2 are the most desirable 2X3 licenses are the least desirable of the lot. But! some may find them desirable. So in the interest of finding the least desriable callsigns for ferners to use, I would suggest that we make a new class of 5X5 callsigns. This would keep the callsigns away from the prefixes already assigned to the different countries, and would eliminate any question of ferners gobbling up those desirable ones. It will be important to have an oversight committee set up to make sure that the callsign is not accidentally desireable. Efforts must be made so that no feren ham has his or her initials in their callsign. All testing must take place at an embassy, and be approved by the respective countries legislative branches, as well as the respectice countries radio commissions. The ferner must pay for a specially trained and reputable VE to be flown to the place of testing. How's that? ...............CQ CQ CQ de KAESB3WRTCD............... hmmmm - Mike KB3EIA - |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Get your trophy KH0x callsign here | Dx | |||
Get your trophy KH0x callsign here | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #667 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #667 | Dx |