Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Although good code operators don't individually recognize each separate
character, code is still not a language. It is a character based system that allows communication. The combining and ordering of characters, whether written letters of the alphabet on paper or tone representation in code, produce communication in whatever language the operator uses. The words in this sentence are English language. Someone with knowledge of German or Tagalo can take the letters and create a sentence in that language. The same can be done with code. The letters and code are not and never will be that language or any other language no matter what speed is achieved. Win wrote: I believe that, at some speed, CW becomes a language. Most high speed operators are not reading the each character. They hear the word. They only resort to character copy on unfamilure words and names. Even the low speed op will hear many short common words. That sounds like a language to me. Win, W0LZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Proof of the Necessity of Amatuer Radio | Policy | |||
FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF | Shortwave | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
Trade Modded DX-398 For Scanner | Shortwave | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |