Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger Wiseman AB8MQ, slipping further into madness and posing as
" wrote: an old fraud wrote: wo Hey, Markie did you clean up that filthy yard yet before the county makes you do it? What gives with your obsession of the yard of someone who lives hundreds of miles from you, Rog? Dave K8MN |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: woger try http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm where the state of Michigan makes clear I am not |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... wrote: woger try http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm where the state of Michigan makes clear I am not That matters little to Roger. He is well known throughout Usenet as being a congenital liar and nobody believes him. You would be best served by dropping your repetitious posts/challenges inviting Roger to look at the web site for himself. You giving the outward appearance of playing HIS game according to HIS rules, which means you lose, Roger wins. Go forth, my son, and spam no more. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Francisco wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: woger try http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm where the state of Michigan makes clear I am not That matters little to Roger. He is well known throughout Usenet as being a congenital liar and nobody believes him. funny how there do exist those that do belive him Steve Robeson for one You would be best served by dropping your repetitious posts/challenges inviting Roger to look at the web site for himself. You giving the outward appearance of playing HIS game according to HIS rules, which means you lose, Roger wins. I thank you for you advice. OTOH I willl decoide my best interest Go forth, my son, and spam no more. no spam spam is by diffintion unsolicted and is also general comercail in nature |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "an old freind" wrote in message oups.com... Francisco wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: woger try http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm where the state of Michigan makes clear I am not That matters little to Roger. He is well known throughout Usenet as being a congenital liar and nobody believes him. funny how there do exist those that do belive him Steve Robeson for one You would be best served by dropping your repetitious posts/challenges inviting Roger to look at the web site for himself. You giving the outward appearance of playing HIS game according to HIS rules, which means you lose, Roger wins. I thank you for you advice. OTOH I willl decoide my best interest Go forth, my son, and spam no more. no spam spam is by diffintion unsolicted and is also general comercail in nature No, Robeson does not believe Roger. Never has so far as I know. He, like the rest of us, knows Roger for what he is. Robeson dislikes Wiseman as much as you. You seem to be as fixated on Robeson as Roger is on Lloyd. Yes, you can decide what is in your best interest, but bear in mind that you are beginning to sound not unlike Wiseman insofar as your constant commentary concerning Robeson is concerned. Want some friendly advice? You would be well advised to show a bit of maturity and "tone it down" a notch or two and step back from the fray. When one wrestles in the mud with pigs, one soon ends up smelling like a pig. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Francisco wrote: "an old freind" wrote in message oups.com... No, Robeson does not believe Roger. Robeson claims he does and Robeson claim every word he posts is truth so I am inclined to believe him on that score Never has so far as I know. He, like the rest of us, knows Roger for what he is. Robeson dislikes Wiseman as much as you. funny he says otherwise You seem to be as fixated on Robeson as Roger is on Lloyd. prehaps to you but as I see it I fix on those that are attacking me, be it Robeson or wismen or someone else inded the thread you choose to use to deliver this advise is about Wismen not robeson Yes, you can decide what is in your best interest,.... mighty white to grant I have that right .... but bear in mind that you are beginning to sound not unlike Wiseman insofar as your constant commentary concerning Robeson is concerned. Want some friendly advice? no or rather I'd ;like friendly advice not someelse telling me to violate my moral concense You would be well advised to show a bit of maturity and "tone it down" a notch or two and step back from the fray. I do I don't for example fabricate lies to attack my foes Both Robeson Wismen and yourself do When one wrestles in the mud with pigs, one soon ends up smelling like a pig. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Francisco Faglossi wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: wo You arfe a registerd sex offender, Markie. That matters little to Roger. He is well known throughout Usenet as being a congenital liar and nobody believes him. BWHAHAHAHA oh the irony, Faglossi. You Go **** that fat wife of yours. Or did she cut you off again, Davey?. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
tards been busy | Policy | |||
Analyzing Woger | General | |||
Analyzing Woger | Policy | |||
Laying Waste to Frank Of Silliland's Silliness | Policy | |||
"Typos", Wogie??? | Policy |