Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 15th 06, 08:03 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc,alt.radio.pirate,alt.radio.broadcasting
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 78
Default Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.


N9OGL wrote:
Part 15 wasn't really in reality designed for experimenting or
broadcasting it was designed to regulated unwanted fields.


Unwanted fields? Sounds like they had Omega One in mind when they
wrote the regulations.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 02:37 AM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Policy 803 January 23rd 04 02:12 AM
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) N2EY Policy 0 November 30th 03 02:28 PM
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st Dwight Stewart Policy 300 August 12th 03 01:25 AM
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement Scott Unit 69 Policy 9 August 1st 03 03:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017