Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Stu Parker wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:16:40 GMT, Carl R. Stevenson wrote: [snip] Go ahead. Pick at nits. We all know what he meant. But the point is well-taken. If CW is to be removed as a *requirement* for a ham license, then its special status has evaporated. Why give it any band-plan perks at all? CW operators can already operate in the phone bands (most of them don't, but that's a free choice), so why not accord the phone users the same freedom of choice? I'd be in favor of reserving a very small portion of each HF band for rtty, psk31, etc., but I'd let all modes permitted by an operator's license be used everywhere else. In other words, it is legitimate and useful to reevaluate the entire band-plan structure of the Amateur Radio Service, and it is even thinkable that what is commonly called the "cw portion" of the bands should be reallocated. Well, Carl, here is a well thought out and well presented argument. Your answer? - Mike KB3EIA - Mike, As another NCI director, I'd tell Stu that IF he feels strongly about his suggestion, he could submit a petition for rulemaking to the FCC. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
help me hack mailbox alert | Antenna | |||
Here it is-BPL full rollout in Va (MANASSAS Va - BPL RED ALERT!!!) | Antenna | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General |