I haven't been caught out. I have no wounds to lick.

You seem unable to answer the challenges that dispute
your (rather childish) outbursts.

You seem to be more and more desperate to score points.

Just face up to the fact that you have made a complete fool
of yourself by, and lost a lot of face from, your support for
the gangrenous degeneration that is the M3/CB licence.

You seem to want to make a great deal of capital out of the
occasional errors (in YOUR opinion) that technically interested
people make; and to use that capital to justify the M3/CB licence.

If it is your assertion that the occasional error by others justifies
the M3/CB licence with no technical basis; then I disagree with you.

Brian Reay wrote in message
...
you do get even more ratty when caught out. Why not just crawl away
and lick your wounds.

I commend to you the works of Britten (and subsequent editors)
and Gazely. Hasluck does not, to my memory, discuss them.

Perhaps you are confusing the remontoire with the Tourbillion?

Brian Reay wrote in message
...
If your clock is weight driven, why have a "remontoire"?

I commend to you the works of Britten (and subsequent editors)
and Gazely. Hasluck does not, to my memory, discuss them.

Perhaps you are confusing the remontoire with the Tourbillion?

Brian Reay wrote in message
...
If your clock is weight driven, why have a "remontoire"?

Please note that this is a _UK_ news group. Please post
in English. (From your displayed intolerance of others'
claims, clearly you cannot claim the below to be a typo)

Brian Reay wrote in message
...
I should have added that the later is the problem addressed by the
"remontoire" (and more crudely by a fusee).

Please note that this is a _UK_ news group. Please post
in English. (From your displayed intolerance of others'
claims, clearly you cannot claim the below to be a typo)

Brian Reay wrote in message
...
I should have added that the later is the problem addressed by the
"remontoire" (and more crudely by a fusee).

The remontoire of the Dennison/Grimethorpe gravity
escapement deals with this.

Brian Reay wrote in message
...
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
Your 5 minutes web search has not revealed the theory
behind the gravity escapement, a form of remontoire,
a means to decouple the pendulum from the going train
I should have added that the later is the problem addressed by the
"remontoire" (and more crudely by a fusee). Neither address the issue of
the interference with the free oscillation of the pendulum or balance.

The remontoire of the Dennison/Grimethorpe gravity
escapement deals with this.

Brian Reay wrote in message
...
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
Your 5 minutes web search has not revealed the theory
behind the gravity escapement, a form of remontoire,
a means to decouple the pendulum from the going train
I should have added that the later is the problem addressed by the
"remontoire" (and more crudely by a fusee). Neither address the issue of
the interference with the free oscillation of the pendulum or balance.

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
I haven't been caught out. I have no wounds to lick.

You seem unable to answer the challenges that dispute
your (rather childish) outbursts.

You seem to be more and more desperate to score points.

Just face up to the fact that you have made a complete fool
of yourself by, and lost a lot of face from, your support for
the gangrenous degeneration that is the M3/CB licence.


With every one of your (top) postings, you make you make yourself look even
more foolish...admit it Gareth, you've well and truly got your arse stuck in
the glue pot!

No doubt, your next course of action will be to consult your £350 law
book...

BWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

tox

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
I haven't been caught out. I have no wounds to lick.

You seem unable to answer the challenges that dispute
your (rather childish) outbursts.

You seem to be more and more desperate to score points.

Just face up to the fact that you have made a complete fool
of yourself by, and lost a lot of face from, your support for
the gangrenous degeneration that is the M3/CB licence.


With every one of your (top) postings, you make you make yourself look even
more foolish...admit it Gareth, you've well and truly got your arse stuck in
the glue pot!

No doubt, your next course of action will be to consult your £350 law
book...

BWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

tox

In article , g3vki@turner-
smith.co.uk says...
| Blimey, I think I'll stick to sundials, I can understand them, I suggest
| Airy does the same.

Sundials are not quite so simple as they at first appear.

--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT)...

Remove the 'NOSPAM' in my email address to reply.

Free Amateur Radio Courses:-
http://www.ukradioamateur.org