Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:50:20 -0800, Justín Käse
wrote: In posted on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:45:39 -0500, Buck wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:10:33 -0800, Justín Käse wrote: I'm considering adding an IF filter to my 706, and am trying to decide between the 1.9kc or the 2.8kc width for use on SSB. Has anyone any experience with either/both? FL-103 2.8kc FL-223 1.9kc Unfortunately I don't, but I am just as anxious to hear the answers. ![]() OK Just got both of them, and after an easy installation want to say that they are well worth the trouble. On crowded bands the narrow filter (FL223) makes an enormous difference in the ability to copy weaker stations 3kc away from adjacent stronger ones, and the slight degradation in audio fidelity is quite an acceptable tradeoff. I also like to listen to AM broadcast band DX, and the ability to use SSB mode to dig out the weaker stations next to strong ones now has improved fidelity with the wider filter (FL103), while still rejecting the splatter from excessively "OptiModded" locals. ...anxiously awaiting the D layer opening this evening g Thank you -- 73 for now Buck N4PGW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Kenwood Crystal Filters & Misc | Swap | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
AOR AR8600MkII - SSB and AM Collins Filters | Scanner | |||
Debugging of LC Bandpass Filters | Homebrew | |||
Debugging of LC Bandpass Filters | Homebrew |